Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T23:36:54.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Valeurs et émotions, les perspectives du néo-sentimentalisme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Christine Tappolet
Christine Tappolet*
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Neo-sentimentalism is the view that to judge that something has an evaluative property is to judge that some affective or emotional response is appropriate to it, but this view allows for radically different versions. My aim is to spell out what I take to be its most plausible version. Against its normative version, I argue that its descriptive version can best satisfy the normativity requirement that follows from Moore’s Open Question Argument while giving an answer to the Wrong Kind of Reason Objection. Finally, I argue that the circularity that is involved is not vicious: understood epistemically, neo-sentimentalism remains instructive.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 7 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Anderson, Elizabeth 1993 Values in Ethics and Economics, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bagnoli, Carla (dir.) 2011 Morality and the Emotions, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, Simon 1984 Spreading the Word, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon 1998 Ruling Passions, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz Clemens 1955 Vom Ursprung sittlicher Erkenntnis [1889], Leipzig, Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard B. 1946 «Moral Valuation», Ethics, vol. 56, p. 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1930 Five Types of Ethical Theory, Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D 1971 «Emotion and Sentiment», dans Lewis, H. D., dir., Broad’s Critical Essays in Moral Philosophy, Londres, Allen et Unwin, p. 283–301.Google Scholar
Brewer, Talbot 2002 «The Real Problem with Internalism about Reasons», Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 32, no4, p. 443–473.Google Scholar
Bykvist, Krister 2009 «No good fit: Why the Fitting Attitude Analysis Fails», Mind, vol. 118, p. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charland, Louis C. 1995 «Feeling and Representing: Computational Theory and the Modularity of Affect», Synthese, vol. 105, p. 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick M. 1981 «Defining Intrinsic Value», Analysis, vol. 41, p. 99–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick M 1986 Brentano and Intrinsic Value, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel 1969 A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion [1706], dans Raphael, D. D., dir., The British Moralists, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 191–225.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger 2005 «Value, Reason and the Structure of Justification: How to Avoid Passing the Buck», Analysis, vol. 65, no1, p. 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan 2000 «Should We Pass the Buck?», dans O’Hear, Anthony, dir., Philosophy, the Good, the True and the Beautiful, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 159–173.Google Scholar
Danielsson, Sven et Olson, Jonas 2007 «Brentano and the Buck-Passers», Mind, vol. 115, p. 511–522.Google Scholar
D’Arms, Justin et Jacobson, Daniel 1994 «Expressivism, Morality, and the Emotions», Ethics, vol. 104, p. 739–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Arms, Justin et Jacobson, Daniel 2000a «Sentiment and Value», Ethics, vol. 110, p. 722–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Arms, Justin et Jacobson, Daniel 2000b «The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘Appropriateness’ of Emotions», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 61, p. 65–90.Google Scholar
D’Arms, Justin et Jacobson, Daniel 2003 «The Significance of Recalcitrant Emotions (Or, Anti-Quasijudgmentalism)», Philosophy (suppl. vol. : Proceedings of the Royal Institute of Philosophy), p. 127–146.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen, Gibbard, Allan et Railton, Peter 1992 «Toward Fin de siècle Ethics: Some Trends», The Philosophical Review, vol. 101, p. 115–189.Google Scholar
Deonna, Julien 2006 «Emotion, Perception and Perspective», Dialectica, vol. 60, no1, p. 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, Sabine 2007 «Affective Perception and Rational Motivation», Dialectica, vol. 61, p. 363–394.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. 1947 The Definition of Good, Londres, Hyperion Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. 1959 Second Thoughts in Moral Philosophy, Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Falk, W. D. 1986 «Fact, Value, and Nonnatural Predication», dans Ought, Reasons and Morality, Ithaca (NY), Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbard, Allan 1990 Wise Choices, Apt Feelings, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldie, Peter 2001 The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. 1997 What Emotions Really Are, Chicago, Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, Bennett 2001 Emotional Reason: Deliberation, Motivation and the Nature of Value, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul 2000 «Norms of Truth and Meaning», dans O’Hear, Anthony, dir., Philosophy, the Good, the True and the Beautiful, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 19–34.Google Scholar
Hume, David 1990 A Treatise of Human Nature [1740], Selby-Bigge, L. A. et Nidditch, P. H., éd., Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1988 Vorlesungen über Ethik und Wertlehre (1908-1914). Husserliana, vol. 28, Melle, U., éd., Dordrecht, Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis 1971 An Inquiry into the Original of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue [1725], Hildensheim, Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark 1989 «Dispositional Theories of Values», Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 63, p. 139–174.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark 1991 «Explanation, Response-Dependence and Judgement Dependence», dans Menzies, P., dir., Response-Dependent Concepts, Canberra, Australian National University, Research School of Social Sciences, p. 122–183.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark 2001 «The Authority of Affect», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 53, p. 181–214.Google Scholar
Jones, Karen 2004 «Emotion, Weakness of Will, and the Normative Conception of Agency», dans Hatzimoyis, A., dir., Philosophy and the Emotions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 181–200.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony 1963 Action, Emotion and the Will, Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lemos, Noah M. 1994 Intrinsic Value: Concept and Warrant, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 1985 «Values and Secondary Qualities», dans Honderich, Ted, dir., Morality and Objectivity: a Tribute to John Mackie, Londres, Routledge and Kegan Paul, p. 110–129.Google Scholar
Mackie, John L. 1977 Ethics. Inventing Right and Wrong, Londres, Penguin.Google Scholar
Meinong, Alexius 1917 « Ueber Emotionale Präsentation », Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol. 183, 2ème partie, p. 1–181.Google Scholar
Menzies, Peter 1998 «Possibility and Conceivability: A Response-Dependent Account of Their Connections», European Review of Philosophy, vol. 3, p. 255–277.Google Scholar
Menzies, Peter et Pettit, Philip 1993 «Found: the Missing Explanation», Analysis, vol. 53, p. 100–109.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Kevin 1998 «From Appropriate Emotions to Values», The Monist, vol. 81, p. 161–188.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Kevinmss «Wie verhalten sich Normen und Werte zueinander?»Google Scholar
Oddie, Graham 2005 Value, Reality, and Desire, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Jonas 2006 «G. E. Moore on Goodness and Reasons», Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 84, no4, p. 525–534.Google Scholar
Olson, Jonas 2009 «Fitting Attitude Analyses of Values and the Partiality Challenge», Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 12, no4, p. 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher 1992 A Study of Concepts, Cambridge (MA), M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip 1991 «Realism and Response-Dependance», Mind, vol. 100, p. 587–626.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip 1998 «Terms, Things and Response-Dependence», European Review of Philosophy, vol. 3, p. 55–66.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. Jesse 2004 Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. Jesse 2006 «Is Emotion a Form of Perception?», dans Faucher, Luc et Tappolet, Christine, dir., The Modularity of Emotions (The Canadian Journal of Philosophy, suppl. vol. 32), p. 137–160.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. Jesse 2007 The Emotional Construction of Morals, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, Wlodek et Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni 2004 «The Strike of the Demon: on Fitting Pro-attitudes and Value», Ethics, vol. 114, no 3, p. 391–423.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, R. Mark 1998 «Projections and Relations», The Monist, vol. 81, p. 133–160.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998 What We Owe to Each Other, Harvard, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max 1991 Le Formalisme en éthique et l’éthique matérielle des valeurs [1913-1916], trad. de Gandillac, M., Paris, Gallimard, 1991.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, A. A. Cooper 1964 An Inquiry Concerning Virtue, or Merit, dans Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times [1711], vol. 2, Robertson, John M., éd., New York (NY), Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Skorupski, John 2000 «Irrealist Cognitivism», dans Dancy, Jonathan, dir., Normativity, Oxford, Blackwell, p. 116–139.Google Scholar
de Sousa, Ronald 1987 The Rationality of Emotions, Cambridge (MA), M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
de Sousa, Ronald 2002 «Emotional Truth», Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 76, p. 247–263.Google Scholar
Sosa, David 2001 «Pathetic Ethics», dans Leiter, Brian, dir., Objectivity in Law and Morals, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 287–330.Google Scholar
Teroni, Fabrice 2007 «Emotions and Formal Objects», Dialectica, vol. 61, no3, p. 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappolet, Christine 1995 «Les émotions et les concepts axiologiques», Raisons Pratiques, vol. 6, p. 237–257.Google Scholar
Tappolet, Christine 2000 Emotions et Valeurs, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Tappolet, Christine 2004 «Through Thick and Thin: Good and its Determinates», Dialectica, vol. 58, no2, p. 207–220.Google Scholar
Tappolet, Christine 2009 «Emotions, Action, and Motivation: the Case of Fear», dans Goldie, Peter, dir., Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 325–346.Google Scholar
Tappolet, Christine 2011 «Values and Emotions: Neo-Sentimentalism’s Prospects», dans Bagnoli, Carla, dir., Morality and the Emotions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 117–134.Google Scholar
Tappolet, Christine 2012«Emotions, Perceptions, and Emotional Illusions», dans Calabi, Clotilde, dir., Perceptual Illusions. Philosophical and Psychological Essays, Londres, Palgrave-Macmillan, p. 207–224.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph 1994 Principle and Sentiment. An Essay in Moral Epistemology, thèse de doctorat, Ithaca (NY), Cornell University.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph 2001 «Sensing Values?», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 53, p. 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph 2009 «The ‘Good’ and the ‘Right’ Revisited», Philosophical Perspective, vol. 23, p. 499–519.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David 1976 «Truth, Invention and the Meaning of Life» [1976], dans Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value, Oxford, Blackwell, 1987, p. 87–138.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David 1987 «A Sensible Subjectivism?», dans Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value, Oxford, Blackwell, p. 185–214.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard 1973 «Morality and the Emotions» [1971], dans Problems of the Self, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 207–229.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin 1992 Truth and Objectivity, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael 2001 The Nature of Intrinsic Value, Lanham (MD), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar