Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T04:08:26.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Truth via Sentential Quantification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Mark Textor
Mark Textor*
Affiliation:
King's College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium/Tribune du livre
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , Summer 2005 , pp. 539 - 550
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

1

Thanks to David Galloway, Keith Hossack, David Papineau, Richard Samuels, and Gabriel Segal for helpful comments on short notice.

References

Bolzano, Bernard 1929 Wissenschaftslehre. 4 vols. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Meiner.Google Scholar
Boolos, George 1985 “Nominalist Platonism.” The Philosophical Review, 94: 327–44.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1984 “Radical Interpretation.” In his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125–39.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth 1982 Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul 1998 Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hugly, Philip, and Sayward, Charles 1996 Intensionality and Truth. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Kalderon, Mark Eli 1997 “The Transparency of Truth.” Mind, 106: 475–97.Google Scholar
Künne, Wolfgang 2003 Conceptions of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, Arthur 1971 Objects of Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman 1986 Philosophy of Logic. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rayo, Agustin, and Stephen, Yablo 2001 “Nominalism Through De-Nominalization.” Nous, 35: 74–92.Google Scholar
Richard, Mark 1996 “Propositional Quantification.” In Logic and Reality: Essays on the Legacy of Arthur Prior. Edited by Copeland, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 437–60.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Stephen 2003 The Things We Mean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simons, Peter 1997 “Higher-Order Quantification and Ontological Commitment.” Dialectica, 51: 255–71.Google Scholar
Soames, S. 1999 Understanding Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred 1935 “Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen.” Studia Philosophica, 1: 261–405.Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred 1999 “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics.” In Truth. Edited by Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 115–44.Google Scholar
Textor, Mark 1997 “Bolzano's Sententialism.” Grazer Philosophische Studien, 53: 181–202.Google Scholar
van Cleve, James 1994 “Predication without Universals? A Fling with Ostrich Nominalism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54: 577–90.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy 1999 “Truthmakers and the Converse Barcan Formula.” Dialectica, 53: 253–70.Google Scholar
Yablo, Stephen 1996 “How in the World.” Philosophical Topics, 24: 255–86.Google Scholar
Yablo, Stephen 2000 “A Paradox of Existence.” In Empty Names, Fiction and the Puzzle of Non-Existence. Edited by Everett, A. and Hofweber, T.. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 275–321.Google Scholar