Article contents
Theological Foundations for Modern Science?*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2010
Extract
It is often said that philosophy in the seventeenth century returned from a Christian otherworldliness to a pagan engagement, theoretically and practically, with material nature. This process is often described as one of secularization, and the splitting off of science from natural philosophy and metaphysics is a traditional figure in accounts of the emergence of the modern. At the same time, the historiographical assumption that early modern science had religious and philosophical foundations has informed such classics as E. A. Burtt's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (1932), Gerd Buchdahl's Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science (1969), and Amos Funkenstein's Theology and the Scientific Imagination (1986). A recent collection testifies to continuing interest in the theme of a positive relationship between theology and science.
- Type
- Critical Notices/Études critiques
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , Summer 1997 , pp. 597 - 606
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1997
References
Notes
1 Lindberg, David C. and Numbers, Ronald L., eds., God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter Between History and Science (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1986).Google Scholar
2 Schuster, J. A., “Descartes and the Scientific Revolution 1618–1634” (Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, 1977), pp. 622–47.Google Scholar
3 Prost, V. G., Atomisme et occasionalisme dans la philosophie cartesienne (Paris: H. Paulin, 1907).Google Scholar
4 Joy, Lynn Sumida, Gassendi the Atomist (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
5 Lennon, Thomas, The Battle of the Gods and Giants (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by