Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T01:09:17.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structure of Scientific Theories, edited and with a critical introduction by Frederick Suppe*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Steven F. Savitt
Steven F. Savitt
Affiliation:
The University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This volume is the record of a symposium on the structer of scientific theories held in urbana, Illinois in the spring of 1969. ofSeven main papers (though two are represented in this volume by “summary-abstracts”), commentaries, discussions, and a postscript form the bulk of the book. The rest is a nearly 240-page monograph-in-the-guise-of-an-introduction by the editor titled “The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories”.

Type
Critical Notices/Études critiques
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 328 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achinstein, Peter 1963. “Theoretical Terms and Partial Interpretation,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 14, pp. 89–105.Google Scholar
Achinstein, Peter 1965. “The Problem of Theoretical Terms,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 2, pp. 193–203.Google Scholar
Achinstein, Peter 1968. Concepts of Science. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Achinstein, P. and Barker, S. F., eds. 1969. The Legacy of Logical Positivism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1952. “Meaning Postulates,” Philosophical Studies, 3, pp. 65–73.Google Scholar
Colodny, R., ed. 1965. Beyond the Edge of Certainty. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
colodny, R., ed. 1966. Mind and Cosmos: Explorations in the Philosophy of Science.Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Feigl, H., Scriven, M., and Maxwell, G., eds. 1958. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol II. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G., eds. 1962. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol III.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. 1965. “Problems of Empiricism,” pp. 145–260 in Colodny [1965].Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. and Strawson, P. F. 1956. “In Defense of a Dogma,” Philosophical Review, 65, pp. 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1958. “Theoretician's Dilemma,” pp.37–98 in Feigl, Scriven, and Maxwell [1958].Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1969. “On the Structure of Scientific Theories,” pp. 11–38 in The Isenberg Memorial Lecture Series, 1965–66. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1970. “On the 'Standard Conception' of Scientific Theories,” pp. 142–63 in Radner and Winokur [1970].Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970a. “Reflections on my Critics,” pp. 23178 in Lakatos and Mus-grave [1970].Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970b. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, enlarged edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A., eds. 1970. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Masterman, Margaret 1970. “The Nature of a Paradigm,” pp. 59–90 in Lakatos and Mus-grave [1970],Google Scholar
Maxwell, G. 1962. “The Necessary and the Contingent,” pp. 398–404 in Feigl and Maxwell [1962].Google Scholar
Morgenbesser, S., ed. 1967. Philosophy of Science Today. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nagel, E., Suppes, P., and Tarski, A., eds. 1962. Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the I960 International Congress. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1962. “What Theories Are Not,” pp. 240–51 in Nagel, Suppes, and Tarski [1962].Google Scholar
H., putnam 1962a “The Analytic and the Synthetic,” pp. 350-97 in Feigl and Maxwell [1962].Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1971. “The 'Corroboration' of Theories,” in Schilpp [1971].Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” Philosophical Review, 60, pp. 20–43, reprinted in Quine [1953].Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1953. From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2nd ed., 1961.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York and London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Radner, M. and Winokur, S., eds. 1970. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol IV. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. 1969. “Correspondence Rules,” Philosophy of Science, 36, pp. 280–90Google Scholar
Schilpp, P., ed. 1971. The Philosophy of Karl R. Popper. LaSalle, III.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Shapere, D. 1964. “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” Philosophical Review, 73, pp. 383–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilpp, P 1966. “Meaning and Scientific Change,” pp. 41–85 in Colodny [1966].Google Scholar
Schilpp, P 1969. “Notes toward a Post-Positivistic Interpretation of Science,” pp. 115–60 in Achinstein and Barker [1969].Google Scholar
Suppes, P. 1962. “Models of Data,” pp. 252–61 in Nagel, Suppes, and Tarski [1962], reprinted in Suppes [1969].Google Scholar
Suppes, P. 1967. “What is a Scientific Theory?,” pp. 55–67 in Morgenbesser [1967].Google Scholar
Suppes, P. 1969. Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.Google Scholar