We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Chabrol, Claude et Marin, Louis. 1974. Le récit évangélique. Paris: AubierGoogle Scholar
Courtés, Joseph. 1976. Semiotique narrative et discursive. Paris: HachetteGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1945. “L' analyse structural en linguistique et anthropoligie” in Word 1.PP. 33–53Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1955. ’The Structural Study of Myth”, reprinted in Levi-Strauss, C. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, 1963, pp. 206–31Google Scholar
Marin, Louis. 1971. Sémiotique de la Passion. Paris: AubierGoogle Scholar
Nef, Frédéric. 1977. ’Introduction to the Reading of Greimas: Towards a Discursive Linguistics” in Diacritics (Spring 1977) p. 18–22; bibliography pp. 39-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavel, Thomas G.1979. “New Approaches to Formal Semiotics” in Semiotica 25, pp. 335–58.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1974. “The Structure of Scientific Theories”, in Suppe, F., ed. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana, III.: University of Illinois Press, pp. 600–14Google Scholar