Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:21:16.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rigorous Regularism: Physical Laws Without Necessity*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Michael Ruse
Affiliation:
University of Guelph

Extract

This is a book about laws. Not, however, about the laws of which we learned in science classes at school: “scientific laws”. It is rather about those universalities which govern the world of facts, what Swartz calls “physical laws”—although this language is slightly misleading because the term is intended to cover the living as well as the non-living world. Of course, it may well be that a scientific law (like Boyle's law) does capture the essence of a physical law, but not necessarily or (apparently) usually. A physical law by definition can never be false, whereas (as Michael Scriven pointed out some years ago) almost paradoxically nearly all (if not all) scientific laws are false.

Type
Critical Notices/Etudes critiques
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mackie, J., Hume's Moral Theory (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979).Google Scholar