Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:34:44.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to David Gallop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

J. F. M. Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Toronto

Extract

Gallop's criticisms are so extensive and so vigorous that one may wonder how he could mean it when he praises my book in the ways he does at the beginning and end of his notice. In the hope of making it believable that some at least of the praise is deserved, I will try to show that much of the criticism is not as damaging as it may at first appear. Most of what I say will be of a rather general nature, and that is perhaps unfortunate when Gallop has gone into so many interesting questions of detail; but one of my general defences will be that this discussion of particular questions not only does not, but could not, support the objection that the decision procedure that is illustrated in the book is incapable of dealing with all too many of the moral dilemmas an average person is likely to have to face.

Type
Critical Notices/Etudes critiques
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)