Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:49:20.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rationalité et néo-darwinisme: l'origine de la pensée selon de Sousa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Frédéric Bouchard
Frédéric Bouchard
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium/Tribune du livre
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , Winter 2007 , pp. 155 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Bouchard, Frédéric et Rosenberg, Alex 2004 «Fitness, Probability and the Principles of Natural Selection», British Journal of Philosophy of Science, vol. 55, no4, p. 693–712.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert 1990 Adaptation and Environment, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buller, David J. 2005 Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy 1997 Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles 1981 The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard 1976 The Selfish Gene, New York-Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard 1983 The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene, New York-Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Sousa, Ronald 2004 Évolution et rationalité, Paris, Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
De Sousa, Ronald 2005 «Biological Individuality», Croatian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 14, p. 1–24.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. et Lewontin, R. C. 1979 «The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme», Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 205, no 1161, p. 581–598.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay et Lloyd, Elisabeth A. 1999 «Individuality and Adaptation across Levels of Selection: How Shall We Name and Generalize the Unit of Darwinism?», Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no21, p. 11904–11909.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. 1980 «Individuality and Selection», Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 11, p. 311–332.Google Scholar
Jablonka, Eva et Lamb, Marion J. 1995 Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford-New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jablonka, Eva et Lamb, Marion J. 2005 Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, F., Laland, K. N. et Feldman, N. W. 2003 Niche Construction, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim 2003 Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar