Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T15:36:13.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems with the Platonist Exemplification Tie between Located Entities and an Unlocated Entity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Jeffrey Grupp
Jeffrey Grupp
Affiliation:
Western Michigan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , Summer 2004 , pp. 491 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, David M. 1989 Universals: An Opinionated Introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David M. 2001 “Universals as Attributes.” In Loux 2001, pp. 65–92.Google Scholar
Bealer, George 1982 Quality and Concept. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butchvarov, Panayot 1979 Being Qua Being: A Theory of Identity, Existence, and Prediction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane 2000 The Tensed Theory of Time. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Reinhardt 1992 The Existence of the World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grupp, Jeffrey 2003 “The Impossibility of an Exemplification Tie between Particulars and Universals.” Metaphysica: The International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics, 4, 1: 27–38.Google Scholar
Hale, Bob 1987 Abstract Objects. New York: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hochberg, Herbert 1981 “Logical Form, Existence, and Relational Predication.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 6: 215–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian 1991 Time and Eternity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Loux, Michael 1998 Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loux, Michael 2001 Metaphysics: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Markosian, Ned 2000 “What Are Physical Objects?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61, 2:375–95.Google Scholar
Moreland, J. P. 2001 Universals. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Oaklander, Nathan, and Smith, Quentin, eds. 1994 The New Theory of Time. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin 1974 The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, H. H. 2001 “Universals and Resemblances.” In Loux 2001, pp. 20–41.Google Scholar
Tooley, Michael 1987 Causation: A Realist Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas 1970 On Universals. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar