Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:13:47.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problem of Non-Human Animals in Levinasian Ethics and a Possible Corrective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2015

BERIL İDEMEN SÖZMEN
BERIL İDEMEN SÖZMEN*
Affiliation:
Istanbul Technical University
*
*<[email protected]>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Animals in Emmanuel Levinas’ ethics can neither respond to the ethical demand, nor can they be the Other from whom the demand emanates. Levinas’ characterisation of the Other as human seems to be incompatible with his description of the Other as infinitely transcendent and of the face as refusing to be contained. A corrective can be found in Martin Buber’s two-dimensional account of the encounter. Buber widens the scope of entities with which morally demanding encounters are possible. Complementing the Levinasian account of the encounter with Buber’s provides a way of recognising non-human animals as the Other in the moral encounter.

Dans l'éthique d’Emmanuel Levinas, les animaux ne peuvent répondre à l’exigence éthique, pas plus qu’ils ne peuvent être l'Autre de qui l’exigence émane. La caractérisation de l’Autre en tant qu'humain opérée par Levinas semble être incompatible avec sa description d’Autrui comme infiniment transcendantal et avec sa conception du visage refusant d’être contenu. Un correctif peut être trouvé dans la version bidimensionnelle de la rencontre décrite par Martin Buber. Buber élargit le champ des entités avec lesquelles des rencontres moralement exigeantes sont possibles. Compléter la version lévinassienne de la rencontre avec celle de Buber permet de reconnaître les animaux non humains en tant qu’Autres dans la rencontre morale.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 769 - 791
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atterton, Peter and Calarco, Matthew, and Friedman, Maurice (eds.) 2004 Levinas & Buber. Dialogue and Difference. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Atterton, Peter 2004 “Face-to-Face with the Other Animal?” In: Levinas & Buber. Dialogue and Difference, edited by Atterton, Peter, Calarco, Matthew, and Friedman, Maurice. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Bekoff, Marc and Pierce, Jessica 2009 Wild Justice. The Moral Lives of Animals. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buber, Martin 1930 “Zwiesprache,” in Das dialogische Prinzip. Gütersloh: Lambert Schneider/Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin 1958 I and Thou. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin 1962 “Das Problem des Menschen,” in Buber, Martin Werke. Erster Band: Schriften zur Philosophie. München and Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider Verlag.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin 1962 “Gottesfinsternis,” in Buber, Martin Werke. Erster Band: Schriften zur Philosophie. München and Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider Verlag.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin 1963 “Antwort,” in Martin Buber edited by Schilpp, P.A., and Friedman, Maurice. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin 1970 I and Thou. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin 2002 “The Education of Character,” in Buber, Martin Between Man and Man. London and New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin 2002 Between Man and Man. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
Calarco, Matthew 2008 Zoographies. The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 2008 The Animal that therefore I am. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
De Waal, Frans 1996 Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and other Animals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guenther, Lisa 2007 “Le flair animal: Levinas and the Possibility of Animal Friendship.” PhaenEx 2, no. 2 (2007): 216–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Leslie 2004 “A Model for Animal Selfhood: Expanding Interactionist Possibilities.” Symbolic Interaction 27 (2004): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krone, Wolfgang 1993 Martin Buber—Erziehung unter dem Radikalanspruch mitmenschlicher Verantwortung. Überlegungen zur Verantwortungsproblematik im Spätwerk Martin Bubers aus pädagogischer Sicht. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
Levi, Primo 1959 If this is a Man. New York: The Orion Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel 1988 “The Paradox of Morality: an Interview with Emmanuel Levinas.” in The Provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the Other. Edited by Bernasconi, Robert and Wood, David, 168–180. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel 1989 “Martin Buber and the Theory of Knowledge.” in The Levinas Reader, edited by Hand, Seán. Oxford UK & Cambridge USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel 1990 “The Name of a Dog, or Natural Rights.” in Difficult Freedom: Essays in Judaism. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel 1991 Totality and Infinity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel 1996 “Transcendence and Intelligibility.” in Levinas, Emmanuel: Basic Philosophical Writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel 1996 “Dialogue with Martin Buber.” in Proper Names. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moyer, Derek 2010 The Priority of the Human in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. M.A. Thesis, Department of Philosophy and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/10704/Moyer_Derek_Harley_ma2010sp.pdf?sequence=1Google Scholar
Overgaard, Søren 2009 Wittgenstein and other Minds. Rethinking Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity with Wittgenstein, Levinas, and Husserl. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 2008 Jewish Philosophy as a Guide to Life: Rosenzweig, Buber, Levinas, Wittgenstein. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter 2004 Preface in Animal Philosophy. Essential Readings in Continental Thought, edited by Atterton, Peter and Calarco, Matthew. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter 2015 http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/may/23/peter-singer-philosophy-animal-welfare (accessed 13 March 2015)Google Scholar
Shapiro, Paul 2006 “Moral Agency in Other Animals.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2006): 357–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smuts, Barbara 2001 “Encounters with Animals.” in Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, No. 5-7 (2001): 293–309.Google Scholar
Sözmen İdemen, Beril 2015 “Relations and Moral Obligations towards other Animals.” In Relations 3 (2) (2015).Google Scholar
Thomas, Elizabeth M. 1993 The Hidden Life of Dogs. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar