Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:01:01.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Probing the Scope of the Minimalism of Lagueux’s Rationality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2013

PETER DIETSCH
PETER DIETSCH*
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium / Tribune du livre
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 491 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 John Hicks, Value and Capital (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 1939, p. 83.

2 Geoffrey Brennan, “Five Rational Actor Accounts of the Welfare State”, Kyklos vol. 54, no.2/3 (2001): 213-34, p. 217.

3 Ibid.

4 The distinction goes back to James Buchanan, What Should Economists Do? Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1980.

5 The reader may find Maurice Lagueux’s reply to this critical notice at the end of this Book Symposium. See section I of «Reply to my Reviewers/Réponse à mes commentateurs».