Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:28:15.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Popper's Objective Knowledge*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2010

Michael Krausz
Michael Krausz
Affiliation:
Bryn Mawr College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes—Discussions
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1974 , pp. 347 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Popper, Karl R., Objective Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).Google Scholar

2 Positivist philosophies of science suffer from this mistake. Two important departures from this attitude are T. S. Kuhn's, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Stephen Toulmin's Human Understanding.

3 In this regard see A. O. Lovejoy's discussion of simplicity in The Great Chain of Being, and R. G. Collingwood's The Idea of History (“Epilegomena”).

4 Difference in the apprehensive mode and critical mode is noted by artists and educators of art when speaking of “switching gears” between the two (e.g. Constance Costigan Christian of the Smithsonian Associates.) An interesting phenomenological account of this switch remains to the offered.