Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:20:04.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On What Does the Issue of Supervenience and Psychophysical Dependence Depend?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Giovanna Hendel
Giovanna Hendel
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , Spring 2002 , pp. 329 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achinstein, P. 1983 The Nature of Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonevac, D. 1995 “Reduction in the Mind of God.” In Supervenience: New Essays. Edited by Savellos, E. E. and Yalçin, U. D.. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, N. 2000 “Supervenience and Psychophysical Dependence.” Dialogue, 39, 2 (Spring): 303–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, B. 1997 “Brain Tumors.” In Encyclopedia of Human Biology. Edited by Dulbecco, R.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1997.Google Scholar
DePaul, M. 1987 “Supervenience and Moral Dependence.” Philosophical Studies, 51, 3 (May): 425–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauci, A. S., Martin, J. B., Braunwald, E., Kasper, D. L., Isselbacher, K. J., Hauser, S. L., Wilson, J. D., and Longo, D. L. 1998 Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 14th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hendel, G. 2002 “Psychophysical Supervenience: Digging in Its Foundations.” Journal of Philosophical Research, 27: 115–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1984 “Concepts of Supervenience.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 45, 2 (December): 153–76. Reprinted in Kim 1993, pp. 53-78. (Page references are to this latter edition.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1987 “‘Strong’ and ‘Global’ Supervenience Revisited.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48, 2 (December): 315–26. Reprinted in Kim 1993, pp. 79-91. (Page references are to this latter edition.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1989 “The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 63: 31–47. Reprinted in Kim 1993, pp. 265-84. (Page references are to this latter edition.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1990 “Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept.” Metaphilosophy, 21, 1–2 (January-April): 1-27. Reprinted in Kim 1993, pp. 131-60. (Page references are to this latter edition.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1993 Supervenience and Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1997 “The Mind-Body Problem: Taking Stock after Forty Years.” Philosophical Perspectives, 11: 185–207.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1998 Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, C. 1995 “Psychophysical Supervenience, Dependency, and Reduction.” In Savellos and Yalçin 1995, pp. 140–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, K., and Trout, J. D. 1995 “Physicalism, Supervenience, and Dependence.” In Savellos and Yalçin 1995, pp. 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paull, C. P.,and Sider, T. R. 1992 “In Defense of Global Supervenience.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 32, 4 (June): 330–45.Google Scholar
Pereira, L. C., and Wrigley, M., eds. 1999 Festschrift in Honor of Oswaldo Chateaubrian, Manuscrito22.Google Scholar
Petrie, B. 1987 “Global Supervenience and Reduction.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48, 1 (September): 119–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, J. F. 1995 “‘Global’ Supervenient Determination: Too Permissive?” In Savellos and Yalçin 1995, pp. 73–99.Google Scholar
Post, J. F. 1999 “Is Supervenience Asymmetric?” In Pereira and Wrigley 1999, pp. 305–44.Google Scholar
Ruben, D.-H. 1990 Explaining Explanation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Savellos, E. E., and Yalçin, U. D., eds. 1995 Supervenience: New Essays. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seager, W. 1988 “Weak Supervenience and Materialism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48, 4 (June): 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. 1984 “Explanatory Asymmetries.” Philosophy of Science, 51 (September): 421–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar