Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:30:59.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Puzzle about Believed Fallibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Yitzhak Benbaji
Yitzhak Benbaji
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University and Shalom Hartman Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I shall consider the phenomenon of believing ourselves to have at least one false belief: a phenomenon I call believed fallibility. I shall first present a paradoxical argument which appears to show that believed fallibility is incoherent; second, note that this argument assumes that we are committed to the conjunction of all our beliefs; third, sketch a more intuitive notion of commitment in which we are not committed to the conjunction of all our beliefs and argue that the original paradoxical argument is now defused; fourth, construct a new paradoxical argument showing that if we believe that we have at least one false belief we are committed to a contradiction, employing the preferable notion of commitment; and, fifth, suggest that perhaps we might avoid the new paradox by denying that closing our beliefs under conjunction is required by rationality.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , Fall 2006 , pp. 679 - 696
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Jonathan Eric 2002 Belief's Own Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benbaji, Yitzhak 2005 “Culpable Bystanders, Innocent Threats, and the Ethics of Self-Defense.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 25: 585–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1982 “Paradoxes of Irrationality.” In Philosophical Essays on Fraud. Edited by Wollheim, R. and Hopkins, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1973 Frege Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Evnine, Simon 1999 “Believing Conjunctions.” Synthese, 118: 201–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evnine, Simon 2001 “Epistemic Modesty and the Nature of Belief.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 82: 157–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Hartry 1978 “Mental Representation.” Erkenntnis, 13: 9–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry 1975 The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Foley, Richard 1979 “Justified Inconsistent Beliefs.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 16: 247–57.Google Scholar
Foley, Richard 1992 “Being Knowingly Incoherent.” Nous, 26: 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert 1986 Change in View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1979 “A Puzzle about Belief.” In Meaning and Use. Edited by Margalit, A.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Kyburg, Henry 1970 “Conjunctivitis.” In Induction, Acceptance and Rational Belief. Edited by Swain, M.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Kyburg, Henry 1997 “The Rule of Adjunction and Reasonable Inference.” The Journal of Philosophy, 94: 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Isaac 1980 The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Isaac 1991 Fixation of Belief and Its Undoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Isaac 1997 “The Logic of Full Belief.” In The Covenant of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Isaac 2003 “Commitment and Change of View.” In Reason and Nature: Essays in the Theory of Rationality. Edited by Bermudex, J. L. and Millar, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David 1982 “Logics for Equivocators.” In Papers in Philosophical Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, J. G. 1999 “Misdisquotation and Substitutivity: When Not to Infer Belief from Assent.” Mind, 108: 333–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pears, David 1984 Motivated Irrationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Roorda, Jonathan 1997 “Fallibilism, Ambivalence, and Belief.” The Journal of Philosophy, 94: 126–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott 2002 Beyond Rigidity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert 1984 Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith 1991 “Self-Defense.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 20: 283–310.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas 1995 “Fine-Grained Opinion, Probability, and the Logic of Full Belief.” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24: 349–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar