No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A New Critical Theory Based on Rational Choice?*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2010
Extract
Joseph Heath's Communicative Action and Rational Choice may be read as a critical commentary upon Habermas's critical social theory, but it may also be read as merely using the latter as “scaffolding” (p. 10) for the presentation of Heath's own version of critical theory. In what follows, I will focus on the second option and thus largely ignore the exegetical question to what extent Heath provides a fair reading of Habermas. This does not mean, however, that I will not make comparative judgements. On the contrary, my overall claim will be that Heath's new critical theory is more functionalist, and. partly as a result, less critical than Habermas's. Since lack of space does not permit me to argue this in accordance with the standards of detail that Heath's own book generally observes, my procedure may be justified by the attempt to provoke a clarificatory response from Heath.
- Type
- Book Symposium/Tribune de Livre
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , Spring 2005 , pp. 351 - 362
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2005
References
Bohman, James 2000 “Distorted Communication: Formal Pragmatics as a Critical Theory.” In Perspectives on Habermas. Edited by Hahn, Lewis E.. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Bohman, James 2003 “Formal Theories, Pragmatic Purposes: Inferentialism, Rational Choice, and Communicative Action.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 33, 3: 423–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Thomas 2004 What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1981 Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. 2 vols. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1983 Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1985 “Questions and Counterquestions.” In Habermas and Modernity. Edited by Bernstein, R. J.. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1996 Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by Rehg, W.. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph 1996 “Rational Choice as Critical Theory.” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 22, 5: 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph 2000 “Ideology, Irrationality and Collectively Self-Defeating Behaviour.” Constellations, 7, 3: 363–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph 2001a “Problems in the Theory of Ideology.” In Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory. Edited by Rehg, W. and Bohman, J.. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Joseph 2001b Communicative Action and Rational Choice. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph 2002 “Should Productivity Growth Be a Social Priority?” In Review of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Vol. 2. Edited by Sharpe, A., Banting, K., St-Hilaire, F.. Ottawa: CSLS-IRPP.Google Scholar
Rehg, William 2002 Review of J. Heath, Communicative Action and Rational Choice. Dialogue, 41, 3: 622–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar