Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T19:23:44.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Michael Friedman on Kant and Newton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

William Harper
William Harper
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , Spring 2000 , pp. 279 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, D. M., ed. 1969 Berkeley's Philosophical Writings. Toronto: Collier-Macmillan Canada.Google Scholar
Cajori, F. 1934 Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B., and Whitman, A., trans. 1999 The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, by Isaac Newton. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Damour, T. 1987 “The Problem of Motion in Newtonian and Einsteinian Gravity.” In 300 Years of Gravitation, edited by Hawking, S. and Israel, W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Damour, T., and Vokrouhlicki, D. 1996 “Equivalence Principle and the Moon.” Physical Review, D 53: 4177–4201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickey, J. O., et al. 1994 “Lunar Laser Ranging: A Continuing Legacy of the Apollo Program.” Science, 265: 482–90.Google Scholar
DiSalle, R. 1990 “The ‘Essential Properties’ of Matter, Space, and Time: Comments on Michael Friedman.” In Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science, edited by Bricker, P. and Hughes, R. I. G., pp. 203–209. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
DiSalle, R. 1992 “Einstein, Newton and the Empirical Foundations of Spacetime Geometry.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 6: 181–89.Google Scholar
DiSalle, R. 1995 “Spacetime Theory as Physical Geometry.” Erkenntnis, 42: 317–37.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1992 Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, W. 1986 “Kant on the A Priori and Material Necessity.” In Kant's Philosophy of Physical Science, edited by Butts, R., pp. 239–72. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, W. 1991 “Newton's Classic Deductions from Phenomena.” PSA 1990, 2: 183–96.Google Scholar
Harper, W. 1993 “Reasoning from Phenomena: Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation and the Practice of Science.” In Action and Reaction: Proceedings of a Symposium to Commemorate the Tercentenary of Newton's Principia, edited by Theerman, P. and Seef, A. F., pp. 144–82. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Harper, W. 1995 “Review of Kant and the Exact Sciences.” The Philosophical Review, 104: 587–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, W. 1997 “Isaac Newton on Empirical Success and Scientific Method.” In The Cosmos of Science, edited by Earman, J. and Norton, J. D., pp. 55–86. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Harper, W. 1998 “Measurement and Approximation: Newton's Inferences from Phenomena versus Glymour's Bootstrap Confirmation.” In The Role of Pragmatics in Contemporary Philosophy, edited by Weingartner, P., Schurz, G., and Dorn, G., pp. 219–41. Vienna: Hölder- Pichler-Tempsky. (This is a proceedings from the 1997 International Wittgenstein Symposium held in Kirchberg, Austria.)Google Scholar
Harper, W., and DiSalle, R. 1996 “Inferences from Phenomena in Gravitational Physics.” PSA 1996, 1: S46–S54.Google Scholar
Harper, W., and Valluri, S. R. 2000 “Jupiter's Moons as Tests of the Equivalence Principle.” Manuscript.Google Scholar
Jessop, T. E., ed. 1969 Berkeley: Philosophical Writings. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Emmanuel 1963 Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Smith, N. Kemp. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, Emmanuel 1970 Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Translated by Ellington, J.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1980 “A Priori Knowledge.” Philosophical Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1996 “Aprioristic Yearnings: Michael Friedman, Kant and the Exact Sciences.” Erkenntnis, 44: 397–416.Google Scholar
Koslow, Arnold, ed. 1967 The Changeless Order: The Physics of Space, Time, and Motion. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Koyré, A. 1968 Newtonian Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laymon, R. 1976 “Newton's Bucket Experiment.” Journal of History of Philosophy, 16: 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malament, D. B. 1995 “Is Newtonian Cosmology Really Inconsistent?” Philosophy of Science, 62:489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misner, C. W., Thome, K. S., and Wheeler, J. H. 1973 Gravitation. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Nordtvedt, K. 1968 “Testing Relativity with Laser Ranging to the Moon.” Physical Review, 170: 1186–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, H. 1991 “‘From the Phenomena of Motions to the Forces of Nature’: Hypothesis or Deduction?” PSA 1990, 2: 209–22.Google Scholar
Taton, R., and Wilson, W., eds. 1995 The General History of Astronomy. Vol. 2B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Will, C. 1991 Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. 2nd rev. ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. 1985 “The Great Inequality of Jupiter and Saturn: From Kepler to Laplace.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 33: 15–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar