Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:54:10.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Luck, Compatibilism, and Libertarianism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2015

ISHTIYAQUE HAJI*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary

Abstract

Many have thought that libertarian accounts of free action succumb to a problem about luck. Recently, it has been proposed that compatibilist accounts, which unlike libertarian ones, maintain that free action and determinism are compatible, are also vulnerable to a problem about luck. In this paper, I argue that the problem of compatibilist luck is not novel insofar as it is one manifestation of a more general concern to which compatibilists and libertarians have responded. Furthermore, these responses are not effective responses to the problem of libertarian luck.

Plusieurs ont soutenu par le passé que les descriptions libertariennes de l’action libre achoppent sur le problème de la chance. Il a récemment été proposé que les descriptions compatibilistes, selon lesquelles l’action libre et le déterminisme sont compatibles, sont affaiblies par un problème similaire. Dans cet article, je soutiens que le problème de la chance compatibiliste n’est pas nouveau, dans la mesure où il s’agit d’une manifestation d’une question plus générale à laquelle les compatibilistes et les libertariens ont répondu. En outre, j’avance que ces réponses ne constituent pas des solutions efficaces au problème de la chance envisagé du point de vue libertarien.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clarke, Randolph 2000 “Modest Libertarianism.” Philosophical Perspectives 14: 2145.Google Scholar
Clarke, Randolph 2003 Libertarian Accounts of Free Will. New York: Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Randolph 2011 “Alternatives for Libertarians.” In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will Second Edition. Kane, Robert (Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, 329348.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1980 Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel 1978 “On Giving Libertarians What They Say They Want.” In Brainstorms. Montgomery, Vermont: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin 1995 “Libertarianism and Avoidability: A Reply to Widerker.” Faith and Philosophy 12: 1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin 2011 “Indeterminism and Control: An Approach to the Problem of Luck.” In Law and Neuroscience. Freeman, Michael (Ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin, and Ravizza, Mark. 1998 Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry 1969 “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.” The Journal of Philosophy 66: 829839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Chris E. 2011 “The Problem of Enhanced Control.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89, 687706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Chris E. 2014 “Event-causal libertarianism, functional reduction, and the disappearing agent argument.” Philosophical Studies 170: 413432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque 2004 “Active Control, Agent-Causation, and Free Action.” Philosophical Explorations 7: 131148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque 2009 Incompatibilism’s Allure: Principal Arguments for Incompatibilism. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque 2012 “Modest Libertarianism and Practical Reason.” Philosophical Issues 22: 201216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque 2013 “Event-Causal Libertarianism’s” Control Conundrums.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 88: 227246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque Forthcoming Luck’s Mischief: Obligation and Blameworthiness on a Thread. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque and Cuypers, Stefaan 2008 Moral Responsibility, Authenticity, and Normative Education. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Robert 1996 The Significance of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kane, Robert 1999a “On Free Will, Responsibility, and Indeterminism: Responses to Fischer, Haji, and Mele.” Philosophical Explorations 2, 105121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Robert 1999b “Responsibility, Luck, and Chance: Reflections on Free Will and Indeterminism.” The Journal of Philosophy 96, 217240.Google Scholar
Kane, Robert 2013 “Frankfurt-style Examples and Self-forming Actions.” In Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Haji, Ishtiyaque and Caouette, Justin (Eds.). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 5873.Google Scholar
Lemos, John 2011 “Kane’s Libertarian Theory and Luck: A Reply to Griffith.” Philosophia 39: 357367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Neil 2011 Hard Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred 1995 Autonomous Agents. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred 1999 “Ultimate Responsibility and Dumb Luck.” Social Philosophy and Policy 16: 274293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred 2006 Free Will and Luck. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred 2013 “Moral Responsibility and the Continuation Problem.” Philosophical Studies 162: 237255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, Michael 2012 Conversation and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereboom, Derk 2014 Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez de Calleja, Mirja 2014 “Cross-World Luck at the Time of Decision is a Problem for Compatibilists as Well.” Philosophical Explorations 17: 112125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter 1983 An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Gary 1975 “Free Agency.” The Journal of Philosophy 72, 205220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar