Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:40:18.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Les propositions invérifiables ont-elles un sens? Probabilité, action et signification chez Hans Reichenbach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Alexis Bienvenu
Affiliation:
Université Paris I – Panthéon Sorbonne

Abstract

Hans Reichenbach argued in Experience and Prediction (1938) that the theory of meaning defended by Logical Positivism, i.e., “strict verificationism,” failed to give a relevant criterion for cognitive meaningfulness. He replaces it with a wholly probabilistic criterion that allows us to establish a pragmatic connection between language and action. But serious difficulties arise in the justification of his theory. The aim of this article is to assess some of these difficulties and to indicate a way to solve them in a “reichenbachian” way.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Carnap, Rudolph 1936 «Wahrheit und Bewährung», Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique, Paris 1935, Paris, Hermann (Actualités scientifiques et industrielles), vol. IV, p. 1823.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolph 19361937 «Testability and Meaning», dans Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, n° 4 (p. 419471) et vol. 4, n° 1 (p. 140), Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gerner, Karin 1997 Hans Reichenbach, sein Leben und Wirken, eine wissenschaftliche Biographie, Osnabrück, Phoebe-Autorenpress.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1994 Words and Life, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans 1938 Experience and Prediction, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans 1939 «Dewey's Theory of Science», dans The Philosophy of John Dewey (2e éd., 1951), sous la direction de P. A. Schilpp, Evanston, Il., Northwestern University (The Library of Living Philosophers), p. 159192.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans 2004 «Les trois tâches de l'épistémologie» (Experience and Prediction, §1), traduction par Bienvenu, A., Laugier, dans S. et Wagner, P. (dir.), Philosophie des sciences, vol. I, Paris, Vrin, p. 295316.Google Scholar
Waismann, Friedrich 1931 «Logische Analyse des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs», dans Erkenntnis, vol. 1, Leipzig, Meiner, p. 228248.Google Scholar