Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:34:09.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La dynamique des intentions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Élisabeth Pacherie
Élisabeth Pacherie
Affiliation:
Institut Jean Nicod, CNRS, Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that in order to solve the main difficulties confronted by the classical versions of the causal theory of action, it is necessary not just to make room for intentions, considered as irreducible to complexes of beliefs and desires, but also to distinguish among several types of intentions. I present a three-tiered theory of intentions that distinguishes among future-directed intentions, present-directed intentions, and motor intentions. I characterize each kind of intention in terms of its functions, its type of content, its dynamics, and the rationality and time constraints that bear on it. I then try to show how the difficulties encountered by the causal theory can be solved within this new framework.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , Summer 2003 , pp. 447 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. X. et Goodale, M. A. 1995 «Size–Contrast Illusions Deceive the Eye, but Not the Hand», Current Biology, vol. 5, p. 679–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach, K. 1978 «A Representational Theory of Action», Philosophical Studies, vol. 34, p. 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermùdez, J. L. 1998 The Paradox of Self-Consciousness, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, M. 1984 Intending and Acting, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. B. 1994 Making It Explicit, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. B. 2000 Articulating Reasons, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. E. 1987 Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buekens, F.Maesen, K. et Vanmechelen, X. 2001 «Dynamic Intentions and Intention Action», manuscrit.Google Scholar
Castiello, U., Paulignan, Y. et Jeannerod, M. 1991 «Temporal Dissociation of Motor Responses and Subjective Awareness. A Study in Normal Subjects», Brain, vol. 114, p. 2639– 2655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chisholm, R. M. 1966 «Freedom and Action», dans K. Lehrer, dir., Freedom and Determinism, New York, Random House, p. 11–44.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1980 Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, L. H. 1979 Theory of Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice–Hall.Google Scholar
Davis, L. H. 1994 «Action», dans S. Guttenplan, dir., A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford, Blackwell, p. 111–117.Google Scholar
Decety, J. et Michel, F. 1989 «Comparative Analysis of Actual and Mental Movement Times in Two Graphic Tasks», Brain and Cognition, vol. 11, p. 87–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., Durozard, D. et Baverel, G. 1992 «Central Activation of Autonomic Effectors During Mental Simulation of Motor Actions», Journal of Physiology, vol. 461, p. 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., Mazziotta, J. C. et Fazio, F. 1994 «Mapping Motor Representations with PET», Nature, vol. 371, p. 600–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S. et Naccache, L. 2001 «Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness: Basic Evidence and a Workspace Framework», Cognition, vol. 79, p. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourneret, P. et Jeannerod, M. 1998 «Limited Conscious Monitoring of Motor Performance in Normal Subjects», Neurospychologia, vol. 36, p. 1133–1140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankfurt, H. G. 1978 «The Problem of Action», American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 15, p. 157–162.Google Scholar
Franz, V. H., Fahlee, M., Gegenfurtner, K. R. et Bülthoff, H. H. 1998 «Size-Contrast Illusions Deceive Grasping as Well as Perception», Perception, vol. 27, p. 140b.Google Scholar
Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Bülthoff, H. H. et Fahle, M. 2000 «Grasping Visual Illusions: No Evidence for a Dissociation Between Perception and Action», Psychological Science, vol. 11, no 1, p. 20–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Daprati, E., Saetti, M. C. et Toni, I. 1996 «Visual Illusion and Action», Neuropsychologia, vol. 34, p. 369–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ginet, C. 1990 On Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1970 A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goodale, M. A., Pélisson, D. et Prablanc, C. 1986 «Large Adjustments in Visually Guided Reaching Do Not Depend on Vision of the Hand or Perception of Target Displacement», Nature, vol. 320, p. 748–750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grezes, J. et Decety, J. 2002 «Does Visual Perception Afford Action? Evidence from a Neuroimaging Study», Neuropsychologia, vol. 40, p. 212–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haffenden, A. M. et Goodale, M. A. 1998 «The Effect of Pictorial Illusion on Perception and Prehension», Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 122–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haffenden, A. M. et Goodale, M. A. 2000 «Independent Effects of Pictorial Displays on Perception and Action», Vision Research, vol. 40, p. 1597–1607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israel, D., Perry, J. et Tutiya, S. 1993 «Executions, Motivations and Accomplishments», Philosophical Review, vol. 102, no 4, p. 515–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, P. et Jeannerod, M. 1999 «Consciousness and the Visuomotor Transformation», Lyon, Institut des sciences cognitives, Working Paper, 99–13.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. 1994 «The Representing Brain: Neural Correlates of Motor Intention and Imagery», Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 17, p. 187–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeannerod, M. 1997 The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. 1999 «The 25th Bartlett Lectures; To Act or Not to Act — Perspectives on the Representation of Actions», Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 52A, no 1, p. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, M. I. et Wolpert, D. M. 1999 «Computational Motor Control», dans M. Gazzaniga, dir., The Cognitive Neurosciences, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. 1992 Springs of Action, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, A. D. et Goodale, M. A. 1995 The Visual Brain in Action, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pacherie, É. 2000 «The Content of Intentions», Mind and Language, vol. 15, p. 400–432.Google Scholar
Penfield, W. 1975 The Mystery of the Mind, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pisella, L., Arzi, M. et Rossetti, Y. 1998 «The Timing of Color and Location Processing in the Motor Context», Experimental Brain Research, vol. 121, p. 270–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossetti, Y. et Revonsuo, A., dir. 2000 Beyond Dissociation. Interaction between Dissociated Implicit and Explicit Processing, Amsterdam-Philadelphie, John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. 1983 Intentionality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. 1992 The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shallice, T. 1988 From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, M. et Ellis, R. 1998 «On the Relations between Seen Objects and Components of Potential Actions», Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 24, p. 830–846.Google ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. et Dreyfus, H. 1991 «Intentionality and the Phenomenology of Action», dans E. Lepore et R. van Gulick, dir., John Searle and His Critics, Cambridge, MA, Blackwell, p. 259–270.Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M. 1997 «Computational Approaches to Motor Control», Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 1, no 6, p. 209–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolpert, D. M. et Ghahramani, Z. 2000 «Computational Principles of Movement Neuroscience», Nature Neuroscience Supplement, vol. 3, p. 1212–1217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed