Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:45:32.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La Critique de la raison pure face aux scepticismes cartésien, baylien et humien

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Plinio Junqueira Smith
Plinio Junqueira Smith
Affiliation:
Universidade São Judas Tadeu (Brésil)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his critical period, Kant thought that scepticism was a threat to the metaphysical enterprise of Enlightenment. He consequently tried to tackle three of its species: Baylean scepticism, which doubts that reason could establish any truth concerning its ideas; Humean scepticism, which must be distinguished from Hume's formulation of the problem if we want to show that synthetic a priori judgements are possible; and Cartesian scepticism, which puts in doubt the reference of empirical concepts to things in the external world. Kant's treatment reveals the fundamental role played by scepticism in his critical enterprise not only as a triple challenge to the critical project, but also as an ally against idealist dogmatism.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 47 , Issue 3-4 , Summer-Fall 2008 , pp. 463 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographique

Al-Azm, S. J. 1972 The Origins of Kant's Arguments in the Antinomies, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, H. 1983 Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense, New Haven et Londres, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. C. 1987 The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, F. C. 2002 German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781–1801, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, G. 2006 The Revolutionary Kant, Chicago et La Salle, IL, Open Court.Google Scholar
Bird, G., dir. 2005 A Companion to Kant, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Charles, S. 2003 Berkeley au siècle des Lumières: immatérialisme et scepticisme au XVIIIe siècle, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, G. et Harris, H. S. 2000 Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, Indianapolis, IN, Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Farr, W., dir. 1982 Hume und Kant: Interpretation und Diskussion, Fribourg et Munich, Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Forster, M. N. 1989 Hegel and Skepticism, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, J. 2003 «The Fact of Judgement: The Kantian Response to the Humean Condition», dans J. Malpas, dir., From Kant to Davidson: Philosophy and the Idea of the Transcendental, Londres et New York, Routledge, p. 22–47.Google Scholar
Forster, M. 2008 Kant and Skepticism, Princeton et Oxford, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Franks, P. 2005 All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism, Cambridge, MA, et Londres, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, S. 1999 Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason, Londres et New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Grier, M. 2001 Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. 1995 Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. 2006 Kant, Londres et New York, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. 2008 Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume, Princeton et Oxford, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1986 La relation du scepticisme avec la philosophie, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. 2003 Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism, Cambridge, MA, et Londres, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoyos, L. E. 2001 El escepticismo y la filosofia trascendental: estudios sobre el pensamiento alemán a fines del siglo XVIII, Bogota, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
Kuehn, M. 1983 «Kant's Conception of Hume's Problem», Journal of the History of Philosophy, no 21, p. 175–193.Google Scholar
Larrère, C. 2001 «Droit naturel et scepticisme», dans P.-F. Moreau, dir., Le scepticisme au XVIe et au XVIIe siècle: Le retour des philosophies antiques à l'âge classique, Paris, Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Maia Neto, J. R. 2005 «Epoché as Perfection: Montaigne's View of Ancient Skepticism» dans J. R. Maia Neto et R. Popkin, dir., Skepticism in Renaissance and Post-Renaissance Thought: New Interpretations, New York, Humanity Books, p. 13–42.Google Scholar
Melnick, A. 2005 «The Second Analogy», dans G. Bird, dir., A Companion to Kant, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Norton, D. F. 1982 David Hume: Common-Sense Moralist, Skeptical Metaphysician, Princeton et Oxford, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Paganini, G. 2005 «Scepticisme, véracité et omnipotence divine à l'aube des Lumières: las cas de Pierre Bayle», dans M.-A. Bernier et S. Charles, dir., Scepticisme et modernité, Saint-Étienne, Université de Saint-Étienne, p. 25–64.Google Scholar
Passmore, J. 1980 Hume's Intentions, Londres, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Popkin, R. 1993 «Skepticism and Anti-Skepticism in the Latter Part of the Eighteenth Century», dans R. A. Watson et J. E. Force, dir., The High Road to Pyrrhonism, Indianapolis, IN, Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Solère, J. L. 2003 «Bayle et les apories de la raison humaine», dans I. Delpla et P. Robert, dir., La raison corrosive: Études sur la pensée critique de Pierre Bayle, Paris, Honoré Champion, p. 87–137.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1995 The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, Londres et New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Terrel, J. 2001 «Hobbes et la crise sceptique», dans P.-F. Moreau, dir., Le scepticisme au XVIe et au XVIIe siècle: Le retour des philosophies antiques à l'âge classique, Paris, Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. 1993 Philosophy and Government: 1572–1651, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. D. 1972 «On Kant and the Refutation of Subjectivism», dans L. W. Beck, dir., Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress, Dordrecht, Hollande, D. Riedel, p. 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar