Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-20T19:03:47.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant's Anti-Cartesianism*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Kenneth R. Westphal
Kenneth R. Westphal
Affiliation:
University of Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium/Tribune du livre
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , Fall 2007 , pp. 709 - 715
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameriks, Karl 2006 “Idealism from Kant to Berkeley.” In Idealism from Kant to Berkeley. Edited by Gersh, S. and Moran, D.. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press, pp. 244–68.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth 1975 “Identity and Predication.” Journal of Philosophy, 72, 13: 343–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul 1987 Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, Robert 2001 Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1902- Kants Gesammelte Schriften. 29 vols. Könniglich Preussische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: G. Reimer, now De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia 1995 “Revisiting Kant's Epistemology: Skepticism, Apriority, and Psychologism.” Nous, 29: 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnick, Arthur 1989 Space, Time and Thought in Kant. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Jay 2007 “Divergent Intuitions: McDowell's Kant and Sellars' Kant.” In his Wilfrid Sellars: Fusing the Image. New York: Oxford University Press, chap. 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleve, James 1999 Problems from Kant. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1998 “Buchdahl's ‘Phenomenological’ View of Kant: A Critique.” Kant-Studien, 89: 335–52.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2001 “Freedom and the Distinction between Phenomena and Noumena: Is Allison's View Methodological, Metaphysical, or Equivocal?” Journal of Philosophical Research, 26: 593–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2004a Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2004b “Must the Transcendental Conditions for the Possibility of Experience be Ideal?” In Ereditè Kantiane (1804–2004): questioni emergenti e problemi irrisolti. Edited by Ferrini, C.. Napoli: Bibliopolis, pp. 107–26.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2006a “How Does Kant Prove that We Perceive, and Not Merely Imagine, Physical Objects?” The Review of Metaphysics, 60: 781–806.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2006b “Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell.” The European Journal of Philosophy, 14, 2: 274–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007 “Consciousness and Its Transcendental Conditions: Kant's Anti-Cartesian Revolt.” In Consciousness and Its Transcendental Conditions: Kant's Anti-Cartesian Revolt. Edited by Heinämaa, S., Lähteenmäki, V., and Remes, P.. Dordrecht: Springer, chap. 10.Google Scholar