Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:22:50.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indétermination de la traduction et sous-détermination chez Quine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Eve Gaudet
Eve Gaudet
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I propose an interpretation of Quine's position on the asymmetry between indeterminacy of translation and underdetermination of theory. The positions of Chomsky, Rorty, and Friedman, who reject the asymmetry, are presented and criticized. The same is done with Follesdal's and Gibson's views, which are favourable to Quine's. I argue that we must admit Quine's realism but not his physicalism in order to accept the asymmetry.

Résumé

Je propose ici une interprétation de la position quinienne sur l'asymétrie entre l'indétermination de la traduction et la sous-détermination. Je discute les articles de Chomsky, Rorty et Friedman, qui prétendent montrer que l'asymétrie défendue par Quine est inacceptable. J'examine en outre les points de vue de Follesdal et Gibson, deux aiiteurs en accord avec Quine au sujet de l'asymétrie. Je défends l'idée selon laquelle il faut admettre le réalisme de Quine, mais pas son physicalisme, pour être en mesure de reconnoitre l'asymétrie entre le cas des théories scientifiques et celui des manuels de traduction.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , Spring 2005 , pp. 313 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Aune, Bruce 1975 «Quine on Translation and Reference», Philosophical Studies, vol. 27, p. 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1969 «Quine's Empirical Assumptions», dans Words and Objections : Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine (sous la dir. de D. Davidson et J. Hintikka), Boston, D. Reidel Publishing Company, p. 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follesdal, Dagfinn 1973 «Indeterminacy of Translation and Under-Determination of the Theory of Nature». Dialectica, vol. 27, p. 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follesdal, Dagfinn 1990 «Indeterminacy and Mental States», dans Perspectives on Quine (sous la dir. de R. Barrett et R. Gibson), Cambridge, Mass., Basil Blackwell, p. 98–109.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael 1975 «Physicalism and the Indeterminacy of Translation», NOÛS, vol. 9. p. 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Roger 1985 «Translation, Physics, and Facts of the Matter», dans The Philosophy of W. V. Quine (sous la dir. de L. Hahn et P. Schilpp), Lasalle, Open Court, p. 139–157 (édition de 1998).Google Scholar
Gibson, Roger 1988 Enlightened Empiricism : An Examination of W V. Quine's Theory of Knowledge, Tampa, University of South Florida Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1960 Word and Object, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1969 «To Chomsky», dans Words and Objections : Essays on the Work of W.V. Quine (sous la dir. de D. Davidson et J. Hintikka), Boston. D. Reidel Publishing Company, p. 302–310.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1970 «On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translations» Journal of Philosophy, vol. 67, p. 178–183.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1979 «Facts of the Matter», dans Essays on the Philosophy of W. V. Quine (sous la dir. de R. W Shahan et C. Swoyer), Norman, University of Oklahoma Press, p. 155–169.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1981 Theories and Things, Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1987 «Indeterminacy of Translation Again», Journal of Philosophy. vol. 84, p. 5–10.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1990 «Comment on Føllesdal», dans Perspectives on Quine (sous la dir. de R. Barrett et R. Gibson), Cambridge, Mass., Basil Blackwell. p. 110.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1998a From Stimulus to Science, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1998b «Reply to Gilbert Harman», dans The Philosophy of W. V. Quine (sous la dir. de L. Hahn et P. Schilpp), Lasalle, Open Court, p. 181–188.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1998c «Reply to Hilary Putnam», dans The Philosophy of W. V. Quine (sous la dir. de L. Hahn et P. Schilpp), Lasalle, Open Court, p. 427–431.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1998d «Reply to Robert Nozick», dans The Philosophy of W. V. Quine (sous la dir. de L. Hahn et P. Schilpp), Lasalle, Open Court, p. 364–367.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 2000a «Response to Anthony», dans Knowledge, Language, and Logic : Questions for Quine (sous la dir. d'A. Orenstein et P. Kotatko). Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 417–419.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 2000b «Response to George», dans Knowledge, Language, and Logic : Questions for Quine (sous la dir. d'A. Orenstein et P. Kotatko). Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 408–410.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1972 «Indeterminacy of Translation and of Truth». Synthese, vol. 23. p. 443–462.Google Scholar