Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:27:50.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hermeneutics as a … Foundationalism?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Chris Tucker
Chris Tucker
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is commonly assumed, at least by continental philosophers, that epistemological hermeneutics and foundationalism are incompatible. I argue that this assumption is mistaken. If I am correct, the analytic and continental traditions may be closer than is commonly supposed. Hermeneutics, as I will argue, is a descriptive claim about human cognition, and foundationalism is a normative claim about how beliefs ought to be related to one another. Once the positions are stated in this way, their putative incompatibility vanishes. Also, to inspire further research I include an appendix which contains an unfinished prototype of a hermeneutic foundationalism.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , Fall 2006 , pp. 627 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonjour, Laurence 1986 “The Coherence Theory of Empirical Knowledge.” In Empirical Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Edited by Moser, Paul. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 116–44.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1976 “The Universality of the Hermeneutical Problem.” In Philosophical Hermeneutics. Edited and translated by Linge, D. E.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. 1999 Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novitz, David 2000 “Interpretation and Justification.” Metaphilosophy, 31: 4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, Myron Manuscript “The Doctrine of the Hermeneutical Circle and Traditional Epistemology.” Unpublished.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin 1993 Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockmore, Tom 1990 “Epistemology as Hermeneutics: Antifoundationalist Relativism.” Monist, 73: 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockmore, Tom 2000 “Interpretation as Historical, Constructivism, and History.” Metaphilosophy, 31: 185–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockmore, Tom 2004 On Foundationalism: A Strategy for Metaphysical Realism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1979 Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1986 “Overcoming Epistemology.” In After Philosophy: End or Transformation. Edited by Bohman, James and McCarthy, Thomas. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 464–88.Google Scholar
Wachterhauser, Brice R. 1994 “Introduction: Is There Truth after Interpretation?” In Hermeneutics and Truth. Edited by Wachterhauser, B. R.. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold 1997 “Post-Kantian Reflections on the Importance of Hermeneutics.” In Disciplining Hermeneutics. Edited by Lunden, Roger. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, pp. 57–68.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold 1999 “Hermeneutics as Epistemology.” In The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Edited by Greco, J. and Sosa, E.. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 415–35.Google Scholar