No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Geach on Generalization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2010
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , Spring 2002 , pp. 221 - 240
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2002
References
Dunn, J. M., and JrBelnap, N. D.. 1968 “The Substitutional Interpretation of the Quantifiers.” Nous, 2: 177–85.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1967 “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry.” In Philosophical Logic. Edited by Strawson, P. F.. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter Thomas 1980 Reference and Generality. 3rd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1976 “Is There a Problem about Substitutional Quantification?” In Truth and Meaning. Edited by Evans, G. and McDowell, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 325–419.Google Scholar
Paul, Lorenzen 1971 Differential and Integral. Translated by Bacon, John. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1967 “Reply to Marcus.” In Contemporary Readings in Logical Theory. Edited by Copi, I. M. and Gould, J. A.. London: Macmillan, pp. 293–99.Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred 1956 “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.” In Logic, Semantics and Metamathematics. Translated by Woodger, J. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 152–278.Google Scholar