Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:24:49.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Écueils des théories de la rationalité*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

J. Nicolas Kaufmann
J. Nicolas Kaufmann
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Un grand nombre de problèmes dont traite aujourd'hui la théorie de la décision reposent sur des problématiques qui appartiennent à des approches philosophiques, méthodologiques et théoriques fort différentes et dont l'auteur de Choix rationnel et vie publique déplore à juste titre l'absence d'unité intrinsèque. En effet, les racines de la théorie contemporaine du choix rationnel ont des ramifications dans trois traditions philosophiques qui ont été maintenues sans entretenir de contacts: théories philosophiques de l'action d'Aristote à Hume, à Kant et à la philosophie analytique de l'action de Davidson; la théorie du conflit de Hobbes à David Gauthier; la théorie de la justice (d'inspiration utilitariste qui a profondément marqué la pensée économique du XXe siècle). Ces branches ont entretenu des interactions sporadiques, mais ces relations n'ont jamais été exploitées systématiquement. Le travail que présente l'auteur est une première tentative dans cette direction, du moins en langue française.

Type
Critical Notices/Études critiques
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , Fall 1999 , pp. 801 - 826
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Allais, Maurice et Hagen, O., dir. 1979 Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox, Dordrecht, D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. Elisabeth M. 1963 Intention, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Aristote, 1970 Éthique à Nicomaque, trad, franç, par Gauthier, R.-A. et Jolif, J.-Y., Paris, Béatrice Nauwelaerts; Louvain, Publications universitaires.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951 Social Choice and Individual Values, New York, John Wiley, édition revisée 1963.Google Scholar
Audi, Rober. 1989 Practical Reasoning, Londres-New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert, dir. 1986 Action, Decision, and Intention: Studies in the Foundations of Action Theory as an Approach to Understanding Rationality and Decision, Dordrecht-Boston, D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratmann, Michael E. 1987 Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Richmond et Sowden, Lanning, dir. 1985 Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem, Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donal. 1980 Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983 Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jo. 1989 The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gäardenfors, Peter et Sahli, Nils-Eric. 1988 Decision, Probability, and Utility: Selected Readings, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1986 Morals by Agreement, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1956 Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Hallden, Soren. 1980 The Foundation of Decision Logic, Lund, Library of Theoria, no 14.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1976 Essays on Ethics: Social Behavior and Scientific Explanation, Dordrecht, D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1977 Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1982 «Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior», dans Sen, A. K. et Williams, B., dir., Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press, p. 39–62.Google Scholar
Hooker, C. A., Leach, J. J. et McClennen, E. F., dir. 1978 Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory, 2 vols. Dordrecht, D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul et Tverski, Amos, dir. 1982 Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, J. Nicolas 1990 «Apriorisme et théorie du choix rationnel: arguments pour la défense de la position de l'École autrichienne», Dialogue, vol. 29, no2, p. 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, J. Nicolas 1996 «The Belief-Desire Model of Decision Theory Needs a Third Component: Prospective Intentions», dans Marion, Mathieu et Cohen, Robert S., din, Québec Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht-Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, vol. 2, p. 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleindorfer, Paul R., Kuhnreuter, Howard et Schoemaker, Paul J. H., dir. 1993 Decision Sciences: An Integrative Perspective, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClennen, Edward F. 1990 Rationality and Dynamic Choices: Foundational Explorations, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 1987 Irrationality, New York-Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 1992 Springs of Action: Understanding Intentional Behavior, New York-Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moutafakis, Nicholas J.. 1987 The Logics of Preference, Dordrecht, D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, John von et Morgenster, Oscar. 1944 Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nida-Rümelin, Julia. 1987 Entscheidungstheorie und Ethik, Munich, Tuduv Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Nida-Rümelin, Julia. 1993 Kritik des Konsequentialismus, Vienne-Munich, Oldenburg.Google Scholar
Nida-Rümelin, Julian, dir. 1994 Praktische Rationalität, Grundlagenprobleme und ethische Anwendungen des Rational Choice-Paradigms, Berlin-New York, Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C. 1986 Game Theory and Political Theory: An Introduction, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, Frank P. 1926 «Truth and Probability», dans F. P., Ramsey, Philosophical Papers, édités par Mellor, D. H., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 52–95.Google Scholar
Rawls, Joh. 1971 A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexande. 1992 Economics-Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Return?, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schick, Frederi. 1984 Having Reasons: An Essay on Rationality and Sociality, Princeton, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, Frederik 1986 «Dutch Bookies and Money Pumps», Journal of Philosophy, vol. 83, p. 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, Frederi. 1991 Understanding Action: An Essay on Reason, Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoemaker, Paul J. H. 1982 «The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations», Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 20, p. 529–563.Google Scholar
Schueler, G. F. 1995 Desire, Its Role in Practical Reason and the Explanation of Action, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1970 Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco, Holden Day.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1974 «Choice, Orderings and Morality», dans Stephan Körner, dir., Practical Reason (Proceedings of the Bristol Conference on Critical Philosophy), Londres, Basil Blackwell, 1974, p. 54–67.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1982 Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1993 Éthique et économic Et autres essais, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
Slote, Michae. 1989 Beyond Optimizing: A Study of Rational Choice, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spohn, Wolfgan. 1978 Grundlagen der Entscheidungstheorie, Kronberg/Ts, Scriptor Verlag.Google Scholar
Stich, Stephe. 1990 The Fragmentation of Reason, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max 1956 «Soziologische Grundbegriffe», dans Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, Berlin, Kiepenheuer & Witsch, p. 1–42.Google Scholar
Wright, Georg Henrik vo. 1963 The Logic of Preference: An Essay, Edingburgh, Edingburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Georg Henrik vo. 1983 Practical Reasoning. Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zeckhauser, Richard 1986 «Comments: Behavioral versus Rational Economics: What You See Is What You Conquer», dans Robert Hogart et Melvin Reder, dir., Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology, Chicago-Londres, The University of Chicago Press, 1986, p. 251–265.Google Scholar