Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T19:12:44.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defending A Conceptual Investigation of Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2020

KYLE JOHANNSEN Open the ORCID record for KYLE JOHANNSEN [Opens in a new window]
KYLE JOHANNSEN*
Affiliation:
Trent University
*
*<[email protected]>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, I explain the arguments my critics target and I respond to their criticisms. Some of my replies further expand upon the ideas covered in my book—A Conceptual Investigation of Justice—and some cover matters that weren’t discussed there. This paper thus substantially contributes to the arguments made in my book.

Cet article détaille et défend les arguments avancés dans l’ouvrage A Conceptual Investigation of Justice en réponse aux critiques. Cette mise au point développe certaines des idées contenues dans le livre, mais elle présente également des perspectives inédites, étayant l’argumentaire de sa thèse principale.

Keywords

G.A. Cohenluck egalitarianismJohn Rawlsdisabilityoriginal positiondifference principle
Type
Book Symposium: Kyle Johannsen’s A Conceptual Investigation of Justice
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 763 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2020 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Elizabeth 1999 “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109 (2): 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaudry, Jonas-Sébastien 2016 “Beyond (Models of) Disability?” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (2): 210–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiano, Thomas 2008 The Constitution of Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannsen, Kyle 2018 A Conceptual Investigation of Justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will 1995 Multicultural Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael 1990 The Politics of Disablement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John 1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1993 Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1999 The Law of Peoples with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter 2010 The Life You Can Save. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Stocker, Michael 1997 “Abstract and Concrete Value: Plurality, Conflict, and Maximization,” in Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, edited by Chang, Ruth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 196–214.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy 2003 “The Primacy of Justice.” Legal Theory 9 (4): 269–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar