Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:12:39.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Conceptual Utility of Malum prohibitum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

STUART P. GREEN
STUART P. GREEN*
Affiliation:
Rutgers School of Law
*
*<[email protected]>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As a means for thinking more precisely about the moral content of criminal offenses, this article argues that we should think of malum in se and malum prohibitum not as binary categories into which an offense does or not fit, but rather as contrasting, scalar qualities that all criminal offenses, to one degree or another, possess. Under this approach, an offense is malum in se to the extent that it criminalizes conduct that is morally wrong independent of the law, while it is malum prohibitum to the extent it criminalizes conduct that is morally wrong (if at all) in virtue of its being illegal.

Afin de réfléchir plus précisément au contenu moral des infractions criminelles, il est soutenu ici que nous devrions envisager le malum in se et le malum prohibitum non pas comme des catégories binaires dans lesquelles peuvent — ou pas — être classées les différentes infractions, mais plutôt comme des qualités contrastées et scalaires que toutes les infractions criminelles possèdent à un degré ou à un autre. Suivant cette approche, une infraction est malum in se dans la mesure où elle criminalise une conduite qui est moralement répréhensible indépendamment de la loi, alors qu’elle est malum prohibitum dans la mesure où elle criminalise une conduite qui est moralement répréhensible (si elle l’est) en vertu du fait qu’elle est illégale.

Type
Special Topic: Mala in se and Mala prohibita
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 33 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackstone, William 1765 Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. 1, *57–58, 524.Google Scholar
Dressler, Joshua 2009 Understanding Criminal Law, 5th ed. LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1961 The Concept of Law, 1st ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr. 1897 “The Path of the Law,” Harvard Law Review 10: 457–478.Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas 2008 Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LaFave, Wayne 2003 Criminal Law. West Publishing, 4th ed.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie 1983 “Law, Co-ordination and the Common Good,” Oxford Journal Legal Studies 3: 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Stuart P. 1997 “Why It’s a Crime to Tear the Tag Off a Mattress: Overcriminalization and the Moral Content of Regulatory Offenses,” Emory Law Journal 46: 1533–1615.Google Scholar
Green, Stuart P. 2005a “Six Senses of Strict Liability: A Plea for Formalism,” in Simester, A.P. (Ed.), Appraising Strict Liability. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Stuart P. 2005b “Uncovering the Cover-Up Crimes,” American Criminal Law Review 42: 9–44.Google Scholar
Green, Stuart P. 2006 Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White Collar Crime. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Stuart P. 2012a Thirteen Ways to Steal a Bicycle: Theft Law in the Information Age. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Stuart P. 2012b “Just Deserts in Unjust Societies,” in Duff, Antony and Green, Stuart (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sayre, Francis Bowes. 1933 “Public Welfare Offenses,” Columbia Law Review 33: 55–88.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990 Why People Obey the Law. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson v. Lee Optical , 348 U.S. 483 (1955).Google Scholar