Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:37:50.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on Sergio Tenenbaum: Appearances of the Good: An Essay on the Nature of Practical Reason (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

G. F. Schueler
G. F. Schueler*
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium/Tribune du livre
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 387 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 These two senses of “function” are connected obviously. The evolutionary history of some feature of some organism provides an explanation of how it came to have the causal role it does have in the larger system being cited.

2 Donald Davidson, 1980 [1963] “Actions, Reasons and Causes”, in Essays on Actions and Events, p. 4, New York: Clarendon Press.

3 The scare quotes here are because of course we are not speaking of logical inconsistency. It is not logically inconsistent to think that giving some of my money to A is good and at the same time that not giving my money to A is good. Nor is it logically inconsistent to want that I have X and want that I not have X. I will drop the scare quotes but clearly the discussion here must understand “inconsistent” in this expanded way.