Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:42:01.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classification of Ideas in Locke's Essay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2010

Walter B. Carter
Walter B. Carter
Affiliation:
Queen's University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The usual interpretation of Locke's Essay concerning Human Understanding is that he tried to show that all of men's complex ideas were formed by a process of compounding simple ideas. Some commentators say this represents his actual approach o t human knowledge, others say that while parts of the Essay are written in this manner it does not represent his final views. All agree that if this compositionalism is Locke's position then it is inadequate and contains numerous contradictions. It is the thesis of this paper that Locke never was a compositionalist in the required sense and that therefore the inadequacies and contradictions do not exist. Since the compositionalists interpret the Essay mainly on the basis of the classification of ideas in the first edition rather than that in the fourth it will be necessary to examine the two classifications in the Essay to see which does represent Locke's position. It will be found that the fourth edition classification represents his views and that this refutes compositionalism.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , June 1963 , pp. 25 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. fraser, A. C. (London: Oxford, 1894), II, 12, 1.Google Scholar

2 Essay II, 11, 14.

3 Essay II, 12, 3.

4 Gibson, J.. Locke's Theory of Knowledge and Its Historical Relations (London: Cambridge, 1931), pp. 47–49.Google Scholar

5 Gibson, op. cit., pp. 63–64.

6 Aaron, R. I.. John Locke (London: Oxford University Press, 1937) p. 99.Google Scholar

7 Aaron, op. cit. p. 102–103.

8 Aaron, op. cit. p. 103.

9 O'Connor, D.J., John Locke (London: Penguin Books, 1952), p. 52. Essay, Introduction, a.Google Scholar

11 Essay, Introduction, 4. See also 6.

12 Yolton, John W.. John Locke and the Way of Ideas (London: Oxford Univer sity Press, 1956).Google Scholar

13 Essay I, 1, 1.

14 Essay I, 3, 23. Locke's italics.

15 An Essay Concerning the Understanding, Knowledge, Opinion and Assent by John Locke, ed. Rand, Benjamin (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1931).Google Scholar

16 Essay II, n, 14.

17 Essay II, 11, 4.

18 Essay II, 11, 6.

19 Essay II, n, 9.

20 Essay II, 25, 1.

21 Essay II, 2, i.

22 Essay II, I, 20.

23 Essay II, i, 22.

24 An Early Draft of Locke's Essay, ed. Aaron, R. I. and Gibb, Jocelyn (London, Oxford, 1936), p. 67.Google Scholar

25 Draft B, sec. 20, p. 66.

26 Draft B, Sec. 26, p. 76; Sec. 26, p. 77; Sec. 57, p. 117; sec. 96, p. 210–211; sec. 98, p. 213; sec. 98, p. 215; sec. 98, 217; sec. 99, p. 218–219; sec. 100, p. 220–221; sec. 153, p. 153, p. 292; sec. 154, p. 295.

27 Draft B, Sec. 59, p. 119–120.

28 Essay II, 12,3.

29 Essay II, 12, b.

30 Essay II, 12, 7.

31 The Works of John Locke. (London, 1823), vol. iv, p. 143Google Scholar

32 Works vol, IV, p. 71.

33 Ibid.