Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:49:08.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Change, Identity and Hume

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

S. C. Patten
S. C. Patten
Affiliation:
University Of Lethbridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Note—Discussion
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 1976 , pp. 664 - 672
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dialogue, Vol. XIII, No. 2 (June, 1974), pp. 239–54.Google Scholar Hereafter I shall refer to this essay as 'A & S'.

2 Reprinted in A. Sesonske, N. Fleming (eds.), Human Understanding: Studies in the Philosophy of David Hume, Wadsworth, Belmont (1965), pp. 99–114. Hereafter, 'P'. Penelhum has responded to critics of this essay, including Ashley, and Stack, in his “Hume's Theory of the Self Revisited.” Dialogue, Vol. XIV, No. 3 (September, 1975), pp. 389–409Google Scholar.

3 A & S, p. 239.

4 Ibid.

5 P, p. 107–08.

6 P, p. 101

7 P, p. 106 and p. 110.

8 A & S, p. 240.

9 A & S, pp. 244–5 and p. 253.

10 A Treatise of Human Nature, Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford (1888; reprinted 1965), p. 261.Google Scholar Hereafter I shall refer to the Treatise as 'T'

11 T, p. 259.

12 A & S., p. 244; T, p.256.

13 A & S, pp. 240–4.

14 A & S, p. 245.

15 A & S, pp. 239.

16 A & S, pp. 249.

17 ibid.

18 T. p. 253.

19 A & S, p. 244 and T, p. 256. The bracketed portion has been inserted by Ashley and Stack.

20 A & S., pp. 244–5.

21 T, p. 256.

22 “Hume and 'Imperfect Identity'”, Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 7 (1957). pp. 340–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Ibid., p. 343.

24 A & S, p. 254.

25 Precisely the same argument for establishing the falsity of A will show as well the flaw in von Leyden's case (op. cit.) for claiming that Hume could not have intended to use the expression 'imperfect identity'.

26 T, p. 74.

27 A & S, p. 240.

28 This paper was written while assisted as a research fellow to the Canada Council. I am grateful to the referee for Dialogue for several helpful comments.