Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:47:03.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Apriorisme et théorie du choix rationnel: arguments pour la défense de la position de l'École autrichienne*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

J. Nicolas Kaufmann
J. Nicolas Kaufmann
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Les représentants de l'École autrichienne sont ici mis sous la même bannière pour autant seulement qu'ils ont été unanimes à revendiquer pour les postulats de l'économie pure, les «lois exactes» (Menger) de la théorie économique, c'est-à-dire de la théorie marginale de l'utilité, un statut particulier en ce sens qu'ils tenaient pour impossible, voire absurde ou simplement inutile de soumettre les postulats en cause à des tests empiriques. L'apriorisme dont ils se réclament, fait à juste titre la marque de commerce de l'École marginaliste autrichienne; Menger en a fourni les principes, von Mises la justification, et Rothbard s'est occupé de propager la doctrine de l'autre côté de l'Atlantique.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , Spring 1990 , pp. 219 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Allais, Maurice et Hagen, Ole, dir. 1979 Expected Utility and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht, Reidel.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth 1971 Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Chicago, Markham.Google Scholar
Bernadelli, Harro 1936 «What Has Philosophy to Contribute to the Social Sciences, and to Economics in Particular?» Economica, vol. 3, p. 443–454.Google Scholar
Blaug, Marc 1980 The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Trad, franç. par Alain et Christiane Alcouffe. La méthodologie économique. Paris, Economica, 1982.Google Scholar
Boland, Lawrence A. 1981 «On the Futility of Criticizing the Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis». The American Economic Review, vol. 71, n° 5, p. 1031–1036.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce J. 1981 Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. Londres, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1970 «Mental Events». Dans Davidson, 1980, p. 207–225.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1973a «Radical Interpretation». Dans Davidson, 1984, p. 125–142.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1973b «The Material Mind». Dans Davidson, 1980, p. 245–259.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1974a «On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme». Dans Davidson, 1984, p. 183–199.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1974b «Psychology as Philosophy». Dans Davidson, 1980, p. 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1976 «Hempel on Explaining Action». Dans Davidson, 1980, p. 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1980 Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1984 Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1985 «A New Basis for Decision Theory». Theory and Decision, vol. 18, p. 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald, Suppes, Patrick et Siegel, Sidney, dir. 1957 Decision Making: An Experimental Approach. Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, Edwin G., dir. 1976 The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City, MO, Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton 1953 Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. 1988 «Decision Theory and the Deductive Method». Tapuscrit. 15 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl Gustav 1965 «Aspects of Scientific Explanation». Dans ses Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays. New York, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. 1943 Principles of Behavior. New York, Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Terence W. 1938 The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory. Londres, Macmillan. Réimpr. New York, Kelley, 1960.Google Scholar
Janich, Peter 1980 Die Protophysik der Zeit. Konstruktive Begründung und Geschichte der Zeitmessung. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Felix 1937 «Do Synthetic Propositions A Priori Exist in Economics?» Economica, vol. 4, p. 337–342.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, J. N. 1986 «Critique wittgensteinienne de la théorie de la mesure». Manuscrito, vol. 1, p. 151–170.Google Scholar
Kirzner, Israel 1976 «0n the Method of Austrian Economics». Dans Dolan, dir., 1976, p. 41–51.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, Paul 1967 Normative Logic and Ethics. Mannheim, Bibliographisches Institut; Zürich, Hochschultaschenbücher-Verlag.Google Scholar
MacCrimmon, Kenneth R. et Larsson, Stig 1979 «Utility Theory: Axioms Versus “Paradoxes”». Dans Allais et Hagen, dir., 1979, p. 333–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machlup, Fritz 1957 «The Problem of Verification in Economics». Dans F. Machlup, dir. Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences. New York, Academic Press, 1978. p. 137–157.Google Scholar
Marschak, Jakob 1950 «Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility». Econometrica, vol. 18, p. 111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Brian P. 1985 «Anomalous Monism and the Irreducibility of the Mental». Dans E. LePore et B. P. McLaughlin, dir. Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1985. p. 331–369.Google Scholar
Menger, Carl 1883 Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. Trad, de l'allemand par F. J. Nock. Sous la dir. de Louis Schneider. New York, New York University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Oskar 1976 «The Collaboration between Oskar Morgenstern and John von Neumann on the Theory of Games». Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 14, n° 3, p. 805–816.Google Scholar
Mosteller, P. et Nogee, P. 1951 «An Experimental Measurement of Utility». Journal of Political Economy, vol. 59, p. 371–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert 1977 «On Austrian Methodology». Synthese, vol. 36, p. 353–392.Google Scholar
Pap, Arthur 1955 Analytische Erkenntnistheorie. Vienne, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1967 «La rationalité et le statut du principe de rationalité». Dans E. M. Claassen, dir. Les fondements philosophiques des systèmes économiques. Paris, Payot. P. 142–150Google Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman 1951 «Two Dogmas of Empiricism». Dans son From a Logical Point of View: Logico-Philosophical Essays. 2e éd. revue. New York, Harper & Row, 1963. P. 20–47.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman 1954 «Carnap and Logical Truth». Dans son The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Éd. revue et augm. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1976. P. 107–133.Google Scholar
Root, Michael 1986 «Davidson on Social Science». Dans E. LePore, dir. Truth and Interpretation : Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Oxford, Basil Blackwell. P. 272–307.Google Scholar
Rothbard, Murray N. 1962 Man, Economy and State. New York, Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Rothbard, Murray N. 1976 «Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics». Dans Dolan, dir., 1976, p. 19–39.Google Scholar
Rotwein, E. 1980 «Flirting with Apriorism : Caldwell on Mises». History of Political Economy, vol. 18, p. 669–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1938 «A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour». Economica, vol.5.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1947 Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Réimpr. New York, Atheneum, 1965.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1972 The Collected Papers of Paul A. Samuelson. 2 vols. Sous la dir. de J. E. Stiglitz. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Savage, Leonard J. 1954 The Foundations of Statistics. New York, Wiley. Réimpr. New York, Dover, 1972.Google Scholar
Schick, Frederik 1984 Having Reasons. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlick, Moritz 1918 Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre. Vienne, Springer.Google Scholar
Schlick, Moritz 1930 «Gibt es ein materiales A priori?» Dans ses Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2 (1925–1936). Sous la dir. de H. L. Mulder et B. F. B. van de VeldeSchlick. Dordrecht, Reidel, 1979. P. 161–171.Google Scholar
Schoemaker, Paul J. H. 1982a «The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations». Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 20, p. 529–563.Google Scholar
Schoemaker, Paul J. H. 1982b Experiments on Decision Under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis. The Hague, Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1973 «Behaviour and the Concept of Preference». Dans J. Elster, dir. Rational Choice. New York, New York University Press, 1986. P. 60–82.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1982 Models of Bounded Rationality. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1985 «Rationality in Psychology and Economics». Dans R. M. Hogarth et M. W. Reder, dir. Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1985. P. 25–41Google Scholar
von Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen 1889 Capital and Interest. 3 vols. Trad, de I'allemand par G. D. Hunche et H. F. Sennholz. South Holland, IL, Libertarian Press, 1959.Google Scholar
von Mises, Ludwig 1949 Human Action : A Treatise on Economics. Réimpr. Chicago, Contemporary Books, 1966. Trad, franç, par R. Audoin. L'action humaine. Traité d'économie. Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1985.Google Scholar
von Mises, Ludwig 1962 The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. Réimpr. Kansas City, MO, Sheed, Andrews, and McMeel, 1978.Google Scholar
von Neumann, John et Morgenstern, Oskar 1944 Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 2e éd. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik 1972 «The Logic of Preference Reconsidered». Dans ses Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2 : Philosophical Logic. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1983. P. 67–92.Google Scholar
Wong, Stanley 1978 The Foundations of Paul Samuelson's Revealed Preference Theory: A Study by the Method of Rational Reconstruction. Londres, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Zeckhauser, Richard 1985 «Comments. Behavioral versus Rational Economics: What You See Is What You Conquer». Dans R. M. Hogarth et M. W. Reder, dir. Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. P. 251–267.Google Scholar