Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:31:52.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thomas Kuhn et l’oubli de la pratique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2013

ROBERTO FREGA
ROBERTO FREGA*
Affiliation:
IMM-CEMS, Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I examine Thomas Kuhn’s work regarding the role played by the concept of practice in the development of his theory of scientific rationality. I outline the epistemological implications of his theory of incommensurability. I then show how the original intuition of a practice-based and social conception of incommensurability is replaced by a more conventional linguistic interpretation. I then examine Kuhn’s solution to the problem of incommensurability and explain its inadequacy. I then show that, ultimately, his failure to grasp the epistemological dimension of practice prevents him from providing a fully satisfactory solution to the epistemological problem raised in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

Cet article examine l’œuvre de Thomas Kuhn au prisme du rôle que joue la notion de pratique dans le développement de sa théorie de la rationalité scientifique. Je commence par exposer les enjeux épistémologiques de la théorie de l’incommensurabilité. Je montre ensuite comment l’intuition originale d’une conception pratique et sociale de l’incommensurabilité en vient à être remplacée par une interprétation linguistique plus conventionnelle. Dans la deuxième partie de l’article, j’examine la solution donnée par Kuhn au problème de l’incommensurabilité et j’en montre l’insuffisance. Je montre ensuite que c’est l’incapacité à penser la dimension épistémologique de la pratique qui empêche Kuhn de donner une solution pleinement satisfaisante au problème épistémologique soulevé par La structure des révolutions scientifiques.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 421 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Aune, Bruce 1987 «Conceptual Relativism», Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 1, p. 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Richard 1983 Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics and Praxis, Pennsylvania Park (PA), University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Brigati, Roberto et Frega, Roberto, dir. 2004 La svolta pratica in filosofia, vol. 1. Grammatiche e teorie della pratica, Macerata, Quodlibet.Google Scholar
Brown, Harold I. 1990 Rationality, Londres, Routledge.Google Scholar
Carrier, Martin 2001 «Changing Laws and Shifting Concepts», dans Hoyningen-Huene, Paul et Sankey, Howard, dir., Incommensurability and Related Matters, Dordrecht, Kluwer, p. 65–90.Google Scholar
Chang, Ruth 1997 Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Steven D. 1990 Relativism, Conceptual Schemes and Categorial Frameworks, Avebury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. 1981 Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical papers, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto 2006 Pensée, expérience, pratique. Étude sur la théorie du jugement de John Dewey, Paris, L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto 2009 Le voci della ragione. Teorie della razionalità nella filosofia americana contemporanea, Macerata, Quodlibet.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto 2012 Practice, Judgement, and the Challenge of Moral and Political Disagreement, Lanham (MD), Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto 2013 La socialité de la raison, Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Frega, Roberto, dir. 2011 Pragmatist Epistemologies, Lanham (MD), Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Michaelet al., dir. 1994 The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Londres, SAGE.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian 1983 Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, Martin et Lukes, Steven, dir. 1982 Rationality and Relativism, Londres, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Horvich, Paul 1993 World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul 1993 Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions. Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, Chicago (IL), University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul et Sankey, Howard, dir. 2001 Incommensurability and Related Matters, Dordrecht, Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irzik, Gürol et Grünberg, Teo 1998 «Whorfian Variations on Kantian Themes: Kuhn’s Linguistic Turn», Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 29, n° 2, p. 207–221.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Struan 2003 «Two Sources of Michael Polanyi’s Prototypal Notion of Incommensurability: Evans-Pritchard on Azande Witchcraft and St Augustine on Conversion», History of the Human Sciences, vol. 16, n° 2, p. 57–76.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Struan 2004 «Abilità artigianale, conoscenza tacita e altri elementi della pratica: la prospettiva di Michael Polanyi», dans Brigati, Roberto et Frega, Roberto, dir., La svolta pratica in filosofia, vol. 1. Grammatiche e teorie della pratica, Macerata, Quodlibet, p. 101–118.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 1970 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2e édition, Chicago (IL), University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 1977 «Objectivity, Value Judgment and Theory Choice» [1973], dans The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, Chicago (IL), University of Chicago Press, p. 320–339.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 1977 «Second Thoughts on Paradigms» [1974], dans The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, Chicago (IL), University of Chicago Press, p. 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 2000 «Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability» [1982], dans The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970-1993, Chicago (IL), University of Chicago Press, p. 33–57.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 2000 «Rationality and Theory Choice» [1983], dans The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970-1993, Chicago (IL), University of Chicago Press, p. 208–215.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 2000 «Possible Worlds in History and Science» [1986], dans The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970-1993, Chicago (IL), University of Chicago Press, p. 58–89.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 2000 «Afterwords» [1990], dans The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970-1993, Chicago (IL), University of Chicago Press, p. 224–252.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 1991 «The Natural and the Human Sciences», dans Hiley, David R., Bohman, James et Shusterman, Richard, dir., The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture, Cornell, Cornell University Press, p. 17–24.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre et Musgrave, Alan, dir. 1970 Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge (MA), Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, Larry 1996 Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence, Boulder (CO), Westview Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair 1977 «Epistemological Crisis, Dramatic Narrative and the Philosophy of Science», The Monist, n° 60, p. 453–472.Google Scholar
Oberheim, Eric et Hoyningen-Huene, Paul 1997 «Incommensurability, Realism and Meta-Incommensurability», Theoria, vol. 12, n° 3, p. 447–465.Google Scholar
Oberheim, Eric 2005 «On the Historical Origins of the Contemporary Notion of Incommensurability: Paul Feyerabend’s Assault on Conceptual Conservatism», Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 36, n° 2, p. 363–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, dir. 2002 Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago (IL), University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman 1971 «Two Dogmas of Empiricism» [1951], dans Rosenberg, Jay F. et Travis, Charles, dir., Readings in the Philosophy of Language, Englewood Cliffs (NJ), Prentice-Hall, p. 63–80.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph 2007 «Practice Theory», dans Turner, Stephen P. et Risjord, Mark W., Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology, Amsterdam, Elsevier, p. 630–681.Google Scholar
Sankey, Howard 1993 «Kuhn’s Changing Concept of Incommensurability», British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 44, n° 4, p. 759–774.Google Scholar
Sankey, Howard 1997a Rationality, Relativism and Incommensurability, Aldershot, Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sankey, Howard 1997b «Incommensurability: The Current State of Play», Theoria, vol. 12, n° 3, p. 425–445.Google Scholar
Sankey, Howard 1998 «Taxonomic Incommensurability», International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 12, n° 1, p. 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R. 1996 Social Practices. A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr et von Savigny, Eike, dir. 2001 The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Londres, Routledge.Google Scholar
Shapere, Dudley 2001 «Reasons, Radical Change and Incommensurability in Science», dans Hoyningen-Huene, Paul et Sankey, Howard, dir., Incommensurability and Related Matters, Dordrecht, Kluwer, p. 181–206.Google Scholar
Siegel, Harvey 2001 «Incommensurability, Rationality and Relativism: In Science, Culture and Science Education», dans Hoyningen-Huene, Paul et Sankey, Howard, dir., Incommensurability and Related Matters, Dordrecht, Kluwer, p. 207–224.Google Scholar
Will, Frederick L. 1988 Beyond Deduction: Ampliative Aspects of Philosophical Reflection, Londres, Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bryan R., dir. 1970 Rationality, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar