Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:45:46.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Struggling With Conditionals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Bryson Brown
Bryson Brown
Affiliation:
University of Lethbridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

David Sanford's If P, Then Q is an ambitious book, aimed at two difficult tasks and addressed to two audiences. It combines a survey of historical and contemporary work on-conditionals with a presentation-of, Sanford's personal views. And it is addressed to both undergraduate students, without, logical training, and professionals seriously interested in conditionals. It is marred by the impossibility of achieving both aims in a book this size, and by the strains of simultaneously addressing audiences with such different needs and interests.

Type
Critical Notices/Études critiques
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , Spring 1992 , pp. 327 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 See Adams, E., “Modus Tollens Revisited,” Analysis, 48, 3 (June 1988): 122–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and McGee, V., “A Counter-Example to Modus Ponens,” Journal of Philosophy, 82, 9 (September 1985): 462–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 See Sinnot-Armstrong, W., Moor, J. and Fogelin, R., “A Defense of Modus Ponens,” Journal of Philosophy, 83, 5 (May 1986): 298–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Sinnot-Armstrong, W., Moor, J. and Fogelin, R., “A Defense of Modus Tollens,” Analysis, 50, 1 (January 1989): 9–16, for a multi-factor, Philonian approach to some problem casesCrossRefGoogle Scholar.