No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Scientific Explanation of Colour Qualia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2009
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Qualia, the subjectively known qualities of conscious experience, are judged by many philosophers and scientists to lie beyond the domain of scientific explanation, thus making the conscious mind partly incomprehensible to the objective physical sciences. Some, like Kripke and Chalmers, employ modal logic to argue that explanations of qualia are impossible in principle. I argue that there already exist perfectly normal scientific explanations of qualia, and rebut the arguments of those who deny this possibility.
RÉSUMÉ: Les qualia, ces qualités connues subjectivement au cours d’une expérience consciente, sont jugées par plusieurs philosophes et savants comme situées hors du domaine de l’explication scientifique. Les qualia rendraient ainsi la conscience partiellement incompréhensible pour les sciences physiques. Kripke et Chalmers, par exemple, emploient la logique modale pour soutenir que les explications en termes de qualia sont impossibles en principe. Je soutiens qu’il y a des explications scientifiques de qualia parfaitement ordinaires, et je repousse les arguments de ceux qui nient cette possibilité.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 479 - 512
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2009
References
Aranyosi, István 2003 “Physical Constituents of Qualia.” Philosophical Studies 116:103-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent, and Kay, Paul 1969 Basic Colour Terms. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Block, Ned, and Stalnaker, Robert 1999 “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap.” Philosophical Review 108: 1-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Alex, and Tye, Michael 2006 “Qualia Ain’t in the Head.” Nous 40: 241-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cajori, Florian 1947 Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David 1996 The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David 1997 “Moving Forward on the Problem of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 4: 3-46.Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul 1995 “The Rediscovery of Light.” Journal of Philosophy 93: 211-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dedrick, Don 1996 “Can Colour Be Reduced to Anything?” Philosophy of Science 63, Supplement (Proceedings): S134-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel 1988 “Quining Qualia”, In Consciousness in Contemporary Science, edited by Marcel, A. J. and Bisiach, E.. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Foss, Jeffrey 1989 “On the Logic of What It Is Like to Be a Conscious Subject.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67: 205-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, Jeffrey 1993 “Subjectivity, Objectivity, and Nagel on Consciousness.” Dialogue 32: 725-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, Jeffrey 1995 “Materialism, Reduction, Elimination, and the Place of Consciousness in Science.” The Journal of Philosophy 92: 401-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, Jeffrey 2000 Science and the Riddle of Consciousness: A Solution. Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, John 2005 “Qualia: They Are Not What They Seem.” Philosophical Studies 126: 397-428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Clyde L. 1983 “Colours, Normal Observers, and Standard Conditions.” Journal of Philosophy 80: 896-913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Clyde L 1987 “Qualia and Materialism: Closing the Explanatory Gap.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48: 281-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Clyde L 1990 “Colour and Illusion. ” In Mind and Cognition: A Reader edited by Lycan, W.Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell, pp. 555-67.Google Scholar
Hodgson, David 1996 “The Easy Problems Ain’t So Easy.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 3: 69-75.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank 1982 “Epiphenomenal Qualia.” Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank 1986 “What Mary Didn’t Know.” Journal of Philosophy 83: 291-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, J. 1983 “Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64: 354-361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David 1980 “Mad Pain and Martian Pain.” In Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology edited by Block, Ned. 216-22. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Loar, Brian 2003 “Qualia, Properties, Modality.” Nous 37; Supplement: Philosophical Issues 13: 113-29.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 1995 “The Are No Easy Problems of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 2: 266-71Google Scholar
Matthen, Mohan 1988 “Biological Functions and Perceptual Content.” Journal of Philosophy 85: 5-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, Mohan 2005 Seeing, Doing and Knowing: A Philosophical Theory of Sense Perception. Oxford, UK University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1974 “What Is It Like To Be a Bat?” Philosophical Review 83: 435-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac 1687 Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translations and page references from Florian Cajori (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, P., and Putnam, H. 1958 “Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2: 3-36.Google Scholar
Ross, Peter W. 2001 “Qualia and the Senses.” The Philosophical Quarterly 51: 495-511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John 1997 “The Mystery of Consciousness.” New York, NY: New York Review of Books, November 2 and 16, 1995.Google Scholar
Tye, Michael 2000 Consciousness, Colour, and Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar