Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:44:53.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Reach of Correspondence: Two Kinds of Categories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Peter Simons
Affiliation:
University of Leeds

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Symposium/Tribune du livre
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benveniste, E. 1958Catégories de pensée et catégories de langue.” Les études philosophiques, 4: 419–29. Reprinted in his Problèmes de linguistique générale, Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 63–74. [“Categories of Thought and Language,” in Problems in General Linguistics, by E. Benveniste. Translated by M. E. Meek. Coral Gable, FL: University of Miami Press, 1971, pp. 55–64.]Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 1973 The Verb “Be” in Ancient Greek. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Künne, W. 2003 Conceptions of Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 1986 The Philosophy of Logical Atomism and Other Essays, 1914–1919. In Collected Papers, Vol. 8. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Simons, P. M. 2002Negation, Duality and Opacity.” Logique et analyse, 177–178: 101–17.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1959 Individuals. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, A. 1846 Geschichte der Kategorienlehre: Zwei Abhandlungen. Berlin: Bethge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1995 Cambridge Letters: Correspondence with Russell, Keynes, Moore, Ramsey, and Sraffa. Edited by McGuinness, B. and von Wright, G. H.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar