Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:33:53.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rational Justification and Mutual Recognition in Substantive Domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2013

KENNETH R. WESTPHAL
KENNETH R. WESTPHAL*
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia, Norwich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that individual rational judgment, of the kind required for rational justification in empirical knowledge or morals, is in fundamental part socially and historically based, although this is consistent with realism about the objects of empirical knowledge and with strict objectivity about basic moral principles. To judge fully rationally that one judges, and thus to justify one’s judgment rationally, requires recognizing one’s inherent fallibility and hence our mutual interdependence for assessing our own and each others’ judgments and their justification. This provides a pragmatic account of rational justification which dispatches the distinction between “rational” and “historical” knowledge.

Une part fondamentale de la sorte de jugement rationnel individuel requise pour la justification rationnelle dans la connaissance empirique ou en morale a une base sociale et historique. Cette thèse est compatible avec le réalisme en matière d’objets de la connaissance empirique, ainsi qu’avec une stricte objectivité en matière de principes moraux. Juger de manière entièrement rationnelle que l’on juge, et donc justifier rationnellement son jugement, requiert que l’on reconnaisse la faillibilité qui nous est inhérente, et donc notre mutuelle dépendance lorsque nous évaluons nos propres jugements et leur justification ainsi que ceux d’autrui. Ceci rend compte de manière pragmatique de la justification rationnelle qui régit la distinction entre la connaissance «rationnelle» et la connaissance «historique».

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 57 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda 1996 Real Knowing: New Versions of the Coherence Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, William 1989aEpistemic Justification: Essays in Epistemology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, William 1989b“A ‘Doxastic Practice’ Approach to Epistemology.” In: In: Clay, M. and Lehrer, K., eds. Knowledge and Skepticism (Boulder: Westview Press), 1–29.Google Scholar
Alston, William 1993 The Reliability of Sense Perception. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, William 2005 Beyond “Justification’: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.1965“Other Minds.” Rpt. in: Flew, A., ed., Logic and Language: First and Second Series (New York: Anchor), 342–80.Google Scholar
Bartels, Andreas 1994 Bedeutung und Begriffsgeschichte: die Erzeugung wissenschaftlichen Verstehens. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Bender, John 1989editor, The Current State of the Coherence Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard 2010editor, The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonjour, Laurence 1997“Haack on Justification and Experience.” Synthese 112:13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchert, David 2006editor, The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan/Thompson-Gale, 10 vols.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd 1969 Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: The Classical Origins Descartes to Kant. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Burbidge, John 1996 Real Process: How Logic and Chemistry Combine in Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler 1979“Individualism and the Mental.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4:73–121.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler 1989“Wherein is Language Social?” In: George, A., ed., Reflections on Chomsky (Oxford: Blackwell), 175–191; rpt. in: Burge (2007), chapter 13.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler 1992“Philosophy of Language and Mind: 1950–1990.” The Philosophical Review 101.1:3–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler 2003“Social Anti-Individualism, Objective Reference.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67.3: 682–690; rpt. in: Burge (2007), chapter 15.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler 2007 Foundations of Mind. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler 2011“Disjunctivism Again.” Philosophical Exporations 14.1:43–80.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1928 Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin: Weltkreis.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1950a“Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.” Revue International de Philosophie 4; rev. ed. in: idem., Meaning and Necessity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956), 205–221.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1950bLogical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick 1982 The Foundations of Knowing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cling, Andrew 1994“Posing the Problem of the Criterion.” Philosophical Studies 75.3:261–292.Google Scholar
Comesaña, Juan 2006“The Pyrrhonian Problematic.” In: Borchert, D., ed., The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Detroit: Macmillan/Thompson-Gale), 8:174–181.Google Scholar
Conant, James Bryant 1957editor, Harvard Case Histories in Experimental Science, 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1983“A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge.” In: LePore, E., ed., Truth and Interpretation. Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 307– 319.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 2001 Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Deregowski, Jan 1973“Illusion and Culture.” In: Gregory, R. L. and Gombrich, E. H., eds., Illusion in Nature and Art (London: Duckworth, New York: Scribner’s), 161–191.Google Scholar
Deregowski, Jan 1980 Illusions, Patterns and Pictures: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
DesCartes, René 1964–76 Adam, Ch. and Tannery, P., eds., Oevres de Descartes, rev. ed., Paris: Vrin, cited as “AT, ” by volume:page number.Google Scholar
DiSalle, Robert 2002“Reconsidering Kant, Friedman, Logical Positivism, and the Exact Sciences.” Philosophy of Science 69:191–211.Google Scholar
Dretske, Frederick I.1971“Conclusive Reasons.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, Frederick I.1981 Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Dretske, Frederick I.2006“Information and Closure.” Erkenntnis 64.3:409–416.Google Scholar
Elgin, Katherine 1996 Considered Judgment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia 2009a“Reason Observing Nature.” In: Westphal, K. R., ed., The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 92–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia 2009b“From Geological to Animal Nature in Hegel’s Idea of Life.” Hegel-Studien 44:45–93.Google Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia 2011“The Transition to Organics: Hegel’s Idea of Life.” In: Houlgate, S. and Baur, M., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Hegel (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogelin, Robert 1994 Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Eli 2006“Knowledge in Indian Philosophy.” In: Borchert, D., ed., The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Detroit: Macmillan/Thompson-Gale), 5:115–125.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L.1970 The Intelligent Eye. London: Weidenfeld and NicolsonGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R. L., and Gombrich, E. H. 1973editors, Illusion in Nature and Art. London: Duckworth, New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L.1974 Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing. London, Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 1993 Evidence and Inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 1998“Reply to Bonjour.” Synthese 112:25–35.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 1998 Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 2002“A Foundherentist Theory of Empirical Justification.” In: Huemer, M., ed., Epistemology: Contemporary Readings (New York: Routledge), 417–31.Google Scholar
Hall, Everett 1960 Philosophical Systems: A Categorial Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J.2006“Sextus Empiricus.” In: Borchert, D., ed., The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Detroit: Macmillan/Thompson-Gale), 8:850–852.Google Scholar
Harper, William 2011 Isaac Newton’s Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, H. S.1997 Hegel’s Ladder, 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.1807 Phänomenologie des Geistes. Bamberg and Würzburg: Goebhardt; critical ed.: W. Bonsiepen and R. Heede, eds., GW 9; “¶” designates consecutive paragraph numbers, correctly provided by T. Pinkard in his translation, Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.1968 Buchner, H. and Pöggeler, O., eds., Gesammelte Werke. Published by the Rheinisch-Westfälischen Akadamie der Wissenschaften in association with the Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. Hamburg: Meiner. Cited as “GW, ” by volume:page.line numbers.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.1812, 1816, 1832Wissenschaft der Logik (1st ed.: 1812–16, Bk. 1, 2nd ed: 1832), 2 vols. GW 11, 12, 21 (Bk. 1, 2nd ed.).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.2000 Marmasse, G., ed., Vorlesung über Naturphilosophie Berlin 1823/24. Nachschrift von K.G.J.v. Griesheim. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.2010 diGiovanni, G., tr., Science of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; provides pagination from GW.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1998 Timmerman, J., ed., Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Meiner, cited as “KdrV, ” “A” and “B” indicate the first (1781) and second (1876) editions, respectively.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 1992“The Naturalists Return.” The Philosophical Review 101.1:53–114.Google Scholar
Konzelmann, Ziv, Keith Lehrer, Anita, and Schmid, Hans Bernhard 2011editors, Self-Evaluation: Affective and Social Grounds of Intentionality. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith, and Kim, Kihyeon 1990“The Fallibility Paradox.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 Supplement, 99–107.Google Scholar
Lewis, Clarence Irving1929Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Charles Scribners; rpt. with corrections New York: Dover, 1956.Google Scholar
Lewis, Clarence Irving 1930“Logic and Pragmatism.” In: Adams, G. P. and Montague, W. P., eds., Contemporary American Philosophy (New York: Macmillan), 31–50; rpt. in: J. D. Goheen and J. L. Mothershead, Jr., eds., Collected Papers of Clarence Irving Lewis (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1970), 3–19.Google Scholar
List, Christian 2005“Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective.” Episteme 2.1:25–38.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen 1990 Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Ojbectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen 1994“The Fate of Knowledge in Social Theories of Science.” In: Schmitt, F., ed., Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield), 135–57.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen 2001 The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 1982“Criteria, Defeasiblity and Knowledge.” Proceedings of the British Academy 68:455–479; rpt. in: idem., Meaning, Knowledge and Reality (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998), 369–394.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 2010“Tyler Burge on Disjunctivism.” Philosophical Explorations 13.3:243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John 2014“A Sellarsian Blind Spot.” In: O’Shea, J., ed., Sellars and his Legacy. (forthcoming)Google Scholar
Merricks, Trenton 1995“Warrant Entails Truth.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55.4:841–855.Google Scholar
Meyers, Robert 1988 The Liklihood of Knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart 1865 Robeson, J. M.. ed., An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy. In: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979), vol. 10.Google Scholar
Moon, Andrew 2012“Warrant does Entail Truth.” Synthese 184:287–297.Google Scholar
Moretto, Antonio 2004 Filosofia della Matematica e della Meccanica del sistema Hegeliano, 2nd rev. ed. Padova, Il Poligrafo.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha 1986, rev. ed. 2002 The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1992“Vindicating Reason.” In: Guyer, P., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 280–308.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard 1980 Watson, R. A. and Force, J. E., eds., The High Road to Pyrrhonism. San Diego: Austin Hill, rpt. Cambridge, Mass.: Hackett, 1993.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard 2003 The History of Skepticism from Savaronela to Bayle. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard, and Vanderjagt, Arjo 1993editors, Scepticism and Irreligion in the Seventheenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.1969 Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Quinton, Anthony 1973 The Nature of Things. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Renault, Emmanuel 2001 Hegel: la naturalisation de la dialectique. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1971“Verificationism and Transcendental Arguments.” Nous 5:3–14.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin 2005 Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Savigny, Eike von 1991“Self-conscious Individual versus Social Self: The Rationale of Wittgenstein’s Discussion of Rule Following.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51:67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sextus Empiricus 1933 Outlines of Pyrrhonism. In: idem., Works, R. G. Bury, tr. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter 2004aeditor, Pyrrhonian Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter 2004b“Classy Pyrrhonism.” In: idem., ed. (2004a), 188–207.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter 2006 Moral Scepticisms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Miriam 1994“Social Empiricism.” Nous 28.3:325–43.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom, Rogers, G. A. J., and Kraye, Jill 2010editors, Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest 1997“How to Resolve the Pyrrhonian Problematic: A Lesson from Descartes.” Philosophical Studies 85.2–3:229–249.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry 1968“Transcendental Arguments.” Journal of Philosophy 65.9:241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, Katja 2011“Ancient Skepticism.” In: Zalta, E. N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism-ancient/, accessed: 26.01.2012.Google Scholar
Wallgren, Thomas 2006 Transformative Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books (Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.1989aHegel’s Epistemological Realism: A Study of the Aim and Method of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.1989b“Hegel’s Attitude Toward Jacobi in the “Third Attitude of Thought Toward Objectivity”.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 27.1:135–56.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.1991“Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Moral World View.” Philosophical Topics 19.2:133–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.1996“Kant, Hegel, and the Transcendental Material Conditions of Possible Experience.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 33:23–41.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.1998a“Hegel’s Solution to the Dilemma of the Criterion.” In: Stewart, J., ed., The Phenomenology of Spirit Reader: A Collection of Critical and Interpretive Essays (Albany: SUNY Press), 76–91.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.1998bHegel, Hume und die Identität wahrnehmbarer Dinge. Historisch-kritische Analyse zum Kapitel „Wahrnehmung“ in der Phänomenologie von 1807. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.1998c“On Hegel’s Early Critique of Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.” In: Houlgate, S., ed., Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature (Albany: SUNY Press), 137–66.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2000“Kant, Hegel, and the Fate of “the” Intuitive Intellect.” In: Sedgwick, S., ed., The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel (New York: Cambridge University Press), 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2003aHegel’s Epistemology: A Philosophical Introduction to the Phenomenology of Spirit. Cambridge, Mass.: Hackett Publishing Co..Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2003b“Can Pragmatic Realists Argue Transcendentally?” In: Shook, J., ed., Pragmatic Naturalism and Realism (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus), 151–75.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2004 Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2005“Kant, Wittgenstein, and Transcendental Chaos.” Philosophical Investigations 28.4:303–23.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2006“Science and the Philosophers.” In: Koskinen, H., Pihlström, S., & Vilkko, R., eds., Science: A Challenge to Philosophy? (Frankfurt am Main: Lang), 125–52.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2007“Consciousness and its Transcendental Conditions: Kant’s Anti-Cartesian Revolt.” In: Heinämaa, S., Lähteenmäki, V. and Remes, P., eds., Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy (Dordrecht: Springer), 223–243.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2007–08“Intelligenz and the Interpretation of Hegel’s Idealism: Some Hermeneutic Pointers.” The Owl of Minerva 39.1–2:95–134.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2008a“Force, Understanding and Ontology.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 57/58:1– 29.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2008b“Philosophizing about Nature: Hegel’s Philosophical Project.” In: Beiser, F. C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth Century Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 281–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2009a“Mutual Recognition and Rational Justification in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit.” Dialogue 48.4:1–47.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2009b“Hegel’s Phenomenological Method and Analysis of Consciousness.” In: Westphal, K. R., ed., The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 1–36.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2010a“From ‘Convention’ to ‘Ethical Life’: Hume’s Theory of Justice in Post-Kantian Perspective.” The Journal of Moral Philosophy 7.1:105–132.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2010b“Hegel, Russell, and the Foundations of Philosophy.” In: Nuzzo, A., ed., Hegel and the Analytical Tradition (New York: Continuum), 174–194.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2010c“Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy.” In: Guyer, P., ed., Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 401–430.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2010–11“Analytic Philosophy and the Long Tail of Scientia: Hegel and the Historicity of Philosophy.” The Owl of Minerva 42.1–2:1–18.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2011“Self-Consciousness, Anti-Cartesianism and Cognitive Semantics in Hegel’s 1807 Phenomenology.” In: Houlgate, S. and Baur, M., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Hegel (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 68–90.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2012“Norm Acquisition, Rational Judgment and Moral Particularism.” Theory and Research in Education 10.1:3–25; DOI: 10.1177/1477878512437477.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2013a“Proof, Justification, Refutation.” In: deLaurentiis, A. and Edwards, J., eds., The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel (London: Bloomsbury), 289–302.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2013b“Objective Spirit: Right, Morality, Ethical Life & World History.” In: deLaurentiis, A. and Edwards, B. J., eds., A Companion to Hegel (London: Bloomsbury), 157–178.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2013c“Autonomie und Freiheit verkörperter Personen. Bemerkungen zu Hegel und den heutigen Lebenswissenschaften.” In: Stekeler-Weithofer, P., Seelmann, K. and Zabela, B., eds., Normativität und Institutionen. Hegels Autonomiebegriff in den Herausforderungen der Lebenswissenschaften (Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck)).Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2013d“Hume, Empiricism and the Generality of Thought.” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 52:1–38; DOI: 10.1017/S0012217313000279.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.2014“Hegel’s Cognitive Semantics, Newton’s Rule Four of Experimental Philosophy and Scientific Realism Today.” Philosophical Inquiries 3.2.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R.(forthcoming)“Conventionalism and the Impoverishment of the Space of Reasons: Carnap, Quine and Sellars.”Google Scholar
Wick, Warner 1951“On the “Political” Philosophy of Logical Empiricism.” Philosophical Studies 2.4:49–57.Google Scholar
Will, Frederick L.1997 Westphal, K. R., ed., Foreword by A. MacIntyre, Pragmatism and Realism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael 1996 Unnatural Doubts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael 1987“Hegel und Cauchy. Eine Untersuchung zur Philosophie und Geschichte der Mathematik.” In: Horstmann, R.-P., ed., Hegel und die Naturwissenschaften (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog), 197–263.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael 1995“Was ist formale Logik?” In: Fricke, C., König, P. and Petersen, T., eds., Das Recht der Vernunft. Kant und Hegel über Denken, Erkennen und Handeln (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog), 19–31.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael 2000“Kantische Urteilstafel und vollständige Induktion: Nachtrag zu meiner Kontroverse mit Ulrich Nortmann.” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 54.1:86–94.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael 2009 Abhandlungen über die Prinzipien der Logik, 2nd rev. ed. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael 2012“Viele Logiken—Eine Vernunft. Warum der logische Pluralismus ein Irtum ist.” Methodos 7:73–128.Google Scholar
Wright, Larry 1999“Reasons and the Deductive Ideal.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 23:197–206.Google Scholar
Wright, Stephen 2013“Does Klein’s Infinitism offer a Response to Agrippa’s Trilemma?” Synthese 190:1113–1130.Google Scholar