Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:44:48.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Publicity, Causation, And The Mind-Body Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

J.-P. Schachter
J.-P. Schachter
Affiliation:
Huron College, London, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Do we still have a Cartesian mind-body problem? Folk wisdom has it that Descartes is responsible for there being a mind-body problem. Nonetheless, the same folk wisdom has it that the mind-body problem is still with us. Discovering the culprit and his modus operandi has not apparently enabled us to neutralize his mischief. How can that be? Perhaps it is because the mind-body problem we have now is not the infamous one of Cartesian origins.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 556 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 A concept A is said to be logically independent of a concept B if and only if A and B share no essential attributes.

2 Feigl, Herbert, “The ‘Mental’ and the ‘Physical’”, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis: 1958), v. ii, p. 396Google Scholar.

3 Israel Scheffler, Science and Subjectivity, p. 1.

4 Feigl, p. 301; cf. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, pp. 44:

I… say that the objectivity of scientific statements lies in the fact that they can be inter-subjectively tested.

5 Scheffler, p. 10.