Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:31:51.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pacifism: A Comment on Beehler's Note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2010

Jan Narveson
Jan Narveson
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes—Discussion
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 1972 , pp. 588 - 591
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Is Pacifism Consistent?”, Ethics, 1968, pp. 148–150. This article was a reply to a criticism which amounts to a more specific application of Beehler's general claim, by Whitman, M. J.; his criticism is found in Ethics, 1966, pp. 307–8Google Scholar, under the title, “Is Pacifism Self-Contradictory?”

2 P. 266 of Rachels' volume, Moral Problems.