Article contents
The One That Got Away: Leslie's Universes*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2010
Extract
According to the jacket cover, John Leslie's Universes is “the first book by a philosopher on these controversial affairs.” Sadly, I must report, the controversy has gotten the better of his philosophy. Leslie's contribution to this area is merely to see, within the dispute, a narrow window through which to promote his own curious view of extreme axiarchism. This alone would not disturb me, were it not for the apparent disdain with which Leslie depicts views opposed to his own, and his infuriating technique of responding to those critics who fail to see the point of his tremendously contrived examples by dogmatically waving these same examples.
- Type
- Critical Notices/Étude critiques
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , Fall 1990 , pp. 589 - 595
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1990
References
Notes
1 Leslie has rejected this argument (in conversation), claiming that the assumption of a “randomly shuffled deck” begs the very question at issue. Of course, this response cuts both ways: neither can one assume (without argument) that the cosmic selection is non random.
2 Mackie, John Leslie, The Miracle of Theism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982), chap. 13.Google Scholar
3 Ibid., p. 237.
4 Ibid., p. 239.
5 Katz, Jonathan, “Why There Is Something: The Anthropic Principle and Improbable Events,” Dialogue, 27 (Spring 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
- 1
- Cited by