Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:55:13.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Names and Indefinite Descriptions in Ontological Arguments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Jordan Howard Sobel
Jordan Howard Sobel
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

So begins a recent ontological argument. But what if there are no most perfect beings? Letting God be one, that is, letting “God” name one at the very beginning seems premature. Clearly it is best to leave “God” out of the argument until one is in a position to introduce him by existential instantiation, or, by further argumentation, to identify him with a most perfect being: clearly it is best to leave “God” out of the argument until it has been established that there is a most perfect being.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 195 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Hartshorne, Charles, The Logic of Perfection (La Sallé: Open Court, 1962).Google Scholar
[2] Kalish, Donald, Montague, Richard, and Mar, Gary, Logic: Techniques of Formal Reasoning (2nd ed.; New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980).Google Scholar
[3] Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Norman Kemp (London: Macmillan, 1958).Google Scholar
[4] Kordig, Carl R., “A Deontic Argument for God's Existence”, Noûs 15 (1981), 207–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Lewis, David, “Anselm and Actuality”, Noûs 4 (1970), 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Malcolm, Norman, “Anselm's Ontological Arguments”, Philosophical Review 69 (1960), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Moore, George Edward, Principia Ethica (Cambridge: University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
[8] Penelhum, Terence, Religion and Rationality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion (New York: Random House, 1971).Google Scholar
[9] Plantinga, Alvin, God, Freedom and Evil (New York: Harper & Row, 1974).Google Scholar
[10]Skyrms, Brian, “Mates Quantification and Intensional Logic”, Australasian Journal of Philosphy 59 (1981), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar