Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:31:56.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La religion dans l’espace public post-séculier, une confrontation critique des perspectives de Habermas et de Gauchet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Antoon Braeckman
Antoon Braeckman*
Affiliation:
Université de Leuven
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This article seeks to demonstrate that in his reading of the role of religion in the public realm, Habermas has overlooked religion’s power to symbolically institute communities. Although Gauchet starts from a vision of religion in which this dimension is central, I contend that he too underestimates the extent in which religion has retained this power within postsecular society.

RÉSUMÉ : Dans sa lecture du rôle de la religion dans l’espace public, Habermas fait abstraction du pouvoir de la religion d’instituer symboliquement les communautés. Gauchet part d’une vision de la religion dans laquelle cette dimension est centrale. Je considère toutefois que Gauchet sous-estime également la mesure dans laquelle la religion a conservé ce pouvoir au sein de la société post-séculière.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 53 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Anderson, Benedict 1991 Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, édition révisée, Londres, Verso.Google Scholar
Braeckman, Antoon 2009 «Habermas and Gauchet on religion in postsecular society. A critical assessment», Continental Philosophy Review, vol. 42, p. 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrent, Michael 2004 «Religion, Republicanism, and Depoliticization. Two Intellectual Itineraries — Régis Debray and Marcel Gauchet», Bourg, dans J., dir., After the Deluge. New Perspectives on the Intellectual and Cultural History of Postwar France, Lanham, Lexington Books, p. 325–349.Google Scholar
Clastres, Pierre 1974 La société contre l’État, Paris, Minuit.Google Scholar
Cooke, Maeve 2000 «Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy», Political Studies, vol. 48, p. 947–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Maeve 2006 «Salvaging and Secularizing the Semantic Contents of Religion. The Limitiations of Habermas’s Postmetaphysical Proposal», International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, vol. 60, p. 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Maeve 2007 «A Secular State for a Postsecular Society? Postmetaphysical Political Theory and the Place of Religion», Constellations, vol. 14, p. 224–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1984 Otobiographies. L’enseignement de Nietzsche et la politique du nom propre. Paris, Galilée.Google Scholar
Doyle, Natalie 2003 «Democracy as Socio-Cultural Project of Individual and Collective Sovereignty. Claude Lefort, Marcel Gauchet and the French Debate on Modern Autonomy», Thesis Eleven, vol. 75, p. 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Natalie 2006 «The Sacred, Social Creativity and the State», Critical Horizons, vol. 7, p. 207–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Bernard 2005 The Philosophy of Claude Lefort. Interpreting the Political, Evanston (IL), Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc et Gauchet, Marcel 2004 Le Religieux après la religion, Paris, Grasset & Fasquelle.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel 1985 Le désenchantement du monde. Une histoire politique de la religion, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel 1997 The Disenchantment of the World. A Political History of Religion, Princeton, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel 1998 La religion dans la démocratie. Parcours de la laïcité, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel 2002 La démocratie contre elle-même, Paris, Gallimard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel 2003 La condition historique. Entretiens avec François Azouvi et Sylvain Piron, Paris, Stock.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel 2005 La condition politique, Paris, Gallimard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geenens, Raf 2007 «The Deliberative Model of Democracy. Two Critical Remarks», Ratio Juris, vol. 20, p. 355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberrmas, Jürgen 1996 Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberrmas, Jürgen 1998 The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haberrmas, Jürgen 2001 Glauben und Wissen. Friedenspreis des Deutschen Buchhandels 2001, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Haberrmas, Jürgen 2005 Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Philosophische Aufsätze, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas 1999 «Democracy’s Lifecycle? Marcel Gauchet on Religion and Politics», European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 2, p. 485–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, Cristina 2007 «Religion in the Public Sphere. Remarks on Habermas’s Conception of Public Deliberation in Postsecular Societies», Constellations, vol. 14, p. 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefort, Claude 1986 Essais sur le politique. XIXe-XXe siècles, Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
Lindahl, Hans 2006 «Give and Take: Arendt and the Nomos of Political Community», Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 32, p. 881–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2004 «Of Savagery and Civil Society. Pierre Clastres and the Transformation of French Political Thought», Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1, p. 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2005 «Savage and Modern Liberty. Marcel Gauchet and the Origins of New French Thought», European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 4, p. 164–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John 1993 Political Liberalism, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1995 Philosophical Arguments, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion 1997 «Difference as a Resource for Democratic Communication», Bohman, J. et Rehg, W., dir., Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press, p. 388–406.Google Scholar
Weymans, Wim 2005 «Freedom through Political Representation. Lefort, Gauchet and Rosanvallon on the Relationship between State and Society», European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 4, p. 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar