Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:59:20.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrity and Impartial Morality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2012

Greg Scherkoske
Greg Scherkoske*
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Among recent criticisms of impartial moral theories, especially in consequentialist and deontological forms, Bernard Williams’ integrity objection is perhaps the most tantalizing. This objection is a complaint—at once both general and deep—that impartial moral theories are systematically incapable of finding room for integrity in human life and character. Kantians have made forceful responses to this integrity objection and have moved on. Consequentialists have found the objection more trying. I offer reasons to think that consequentialists too can safely move on. These reasons suggest the relationship between integrity and impartiality is less antagonistic than often supposed.

RÉSUMÉ : Parmi les récentes critiques des théories morales impartiales, notamment les critiques conséquentialiste et déontologique, l’objection d’intégrité de Bernard Williams est possiblement la plus attrayante. Cette objection—à la fois générale et profonde—reproche aux théories morales impartiales d’être incapables de retrouver l’intégrité dans la vie et le caractère humains. Les kantiens ont répondu vigoureusement à cette objection, puis sont passés à autre chose. Les conséquentialistes ont trouvé l’objection plus éprouvante. Je soutiens que les conséquentialistes peuvent, eux aussi, passer à autre chose, en suggérant que le rapport entre l’intégrité et l’impartialité est moins antagonique que supposé.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 289 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashford, Elizabeth 2000 “Utilitarianism, Integrity and Partiality.” Journal of Philosophy 97: 421–439.Google Scholar
Bonanno, G. et al. . 2002 “Resilience to Loss and Chronic Grief”, The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 1150–1164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonanno, G. et al. . 2005 “Resilience to Loss in Bereaved Spouses, Bereaved Parents and Bereaved Gay Men.” The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88: 827–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brickman, P. et al. . 1978 “Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Is Happiness Relative?” The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 917–927.Google Scholar
Buss, Sarah 2006 “Needs (Someone Else’s), Projects (My Own), and Reasons.” Journal of Philosophy 103: 373–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire 1995 “Standing for Something.” Journal of Philosophy XCII: 235–260.Google Scholar
Chappell, Timothy 2007 “Integrity and Demandingness.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10: 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Damian; La Caze, Marguerite; Levine, Michael P. 1999 “Should We Strive for Integrity?” Journal of Value Inquiry Vol. 33, No. 4: 519–530.Google Scholar
Cox, Damian; La Caze, Marguerite; Levine, Michael P 2003 Integrity and the Fragile Self. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger 2003 “Equality, Priority, and Compassion.” Ethics 113: 145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullity, Garrett 2004 The Moral Demands of Affluence. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen 2005 The Second-Person Standpoint. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry 2006 Taking Ourselves Seriously & Getting It Right. ed. Satz, Deborah. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Jody 2001 “Does Integrity Require Moral Goodness?” Ratio 14: 234–251.Google Scholar
Halfon, Mark 1989 Integrity: A Philosophical Inquiry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, Robert 1998 “Must We Be Good Samaritans?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28: 453–70.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Edward 1998 “Integrity, Practical Deliberation and Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 48: 189–198.Google Scholar
Harris, John 1974 “Williams on Negative Responsibility and Integrity.” Philosophical Quarterly 24: 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John 1975 “The Survival Lottery.” Philosophy 50: 81–7.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara 1983 “Integrity and Impartiality.” Monist 66: 233–250.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara 1993 The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara 2004 “The Scope of Moral Requirement.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 30: 227–56Google Scholar
Hooker, Brad 2000 Ideal Code, Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, Paul 1997 “Agent Centered Restrictions: Clearing the Air of Paradox.” Ethics 108: 120–146.Google Scholar
Hurley, Paul 2009 Beyond Consequentialism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Shelly 1989 The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine 1996 The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine 2009 Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity and Integrity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine 2011 “Scepticism About Practical Reason.” in Setiya and Paakkunainen (eds.)Google Scholar
Moller, Dan 2007 “Love and Death.” Journal of Philosophy 104: 301–316.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Tim 2001 The Demands of Consequentialism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam 1999 Moral Demands in Non-Ideal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter 1984 “Alienation, Consequentialism and the Demands of Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 13: 134–72.Google Scholar
Rivera, Lisa 2007 “Sacrifices, Aspirations and Morality: Williams Reconsidered.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10: 69–87.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1991 Partiality and Impartiality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek 1997 “Equality and priority.” Ratio 10: 202–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portmore, Douglas 2001 “Can an Act-Consequentialist Theory be Agent Relative?” American Philosophical Quarterly 38: 363–377.Google Scholar
Rajczi, Alex 2009 “Consequentialism, Integrity and Ordinary Morality.” Utilitas 21: 376–92.Google Scholar
Ridge, Michael 2001 “Agent-neutral Consequentialism from the Inside-Out: Concern for Integrity without Self-Indulgence.” Utilitas 13: 236–254.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M. 1998 What We Owe To Each Other. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel 1992 Human Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel 1993 The Rejection of Consequentialism. Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel 1997 “Relationships and Responsibilities.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 26: 189–209.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel 2004 “Projects, Relationships, and Reasons.” in Scheffler, , Wallace, , Pettit, and Smith, , eds. Reasons and Values: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel 2010 Equality and Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel 2011 “Morality and Reasonable Partiality.” in Partiality and Impartiality. Feltham, and Cottingham, , eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scherkoske, Greg 2010 “Integrity and Moral Danger.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40: 335–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setiya, Kieran and Paakkunainen, Hille 2011 Internal Reasons: Contemporary Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael 1985 Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sobel, David 2007 “The Impotence of the Demandingness Objection.” Philosopher’s Imprint. 7: 1–17.Google Scholar
Tiffany, Evan 2003 “Alienation and Internal Reasons for Action.” Social Theory and Practice 29: 387–418.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alan 2005 “Reasonable Partiality and the Agent’s Point of View.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8: 25–43.Google Scholar
Unger, Peter 1996 Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusions of Innocence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, David 2002 “Identity and Identification.” In Contours of Agency. Eds. Buss, S. and Overton, L.91–123.Google Scholar
Velleman, David 2006 “Willing the Law.” in Self to Self. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay 2004 “The Rightness of Acts and the Goodness of Lives” in Scheffler, , Wallace, , Pettit, and Smith, , eds. Reasons and Values: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay 2009 “The Publicity of Reasons.” Philosophical Perspectives 23: 471–497.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard 1973a “Integrity.” In Smart, J.J.C. and Williams, Bernard, Utilitarianism: For and Against. New York: Cambridge, 108–117.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard 1973b “The Makropulos case: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality.” Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 82-100.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard 1981a “Utilitarianism and Moral Self-Indulgence.” Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers, 1973-1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 40-53.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard 1981b “Persons, Character and Morality.” Moral Luck. 1–19.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard 1995 “Replies.” in World, Mind and Ethics. eds. Altham, and Harrison, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 210–16.Google Scholar