No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
In Defence of Virtue
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 June 2010
Extract
I never thought that one of my sex and proclivities would be called upon to defend his virtue. Reading Mr. Henderson's article, ‘Mr. Wheatley's Virtue: A Philosophical Examination’ (Dialogue, March, 1967), convinces me otherwise.
- Type
- Discussions/Notes
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , September 1967 , pp. 240 - 241
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1967
References
1 “Knowing where it's at” should not be construed as entirely a cognitive claim but more as a(n inner) state claim; not, however, an inner state claim on a logical par with saying one has a toothache.
2 Luck is necessary, as I pointed out in a later paper on virtue (Analysis, December, 1963); it is necessary because not everyone is equal in spiritual gifts. But this should not surprise us. As Mr. Henderson's paper clearly shows, not everyone can read.