Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:24:59.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identifying Spinoza’s Immediate Infinite Mode of Extension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2013

THADDEUS S. ROBINSON
THADDEUS S. ROBINSON*
Affiliation:
Muhlenberg College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The immediate infinite mode of extension is one of the more mysterious elements of Spinoza’s ontology. Despite its importance to Spinoza’s metaphysical system, Spinoza tells us very little about this mode. In the effort to make some progress on this question, I examine three prominent hypotheses about this mode’s identity: the Force Interpretation, the Nomic Interpretation, and the Kinetic Interpretation. I argue, first, that both the Force Interpretation and the Nomic Interpretation are subject to a number of serious objections. Second, I argue that in spite of scholars’ claims to the contrary, the Kinetic Interpretation is a live option.

Le mode infini immédiat de l’étendue (MIIE) est l’un des éléments les plus mystérieux de l’ontologie de Spinoza. Malgré son importance pour le système métaphysique de Spinoza, ce dernier nous dit très peu à propos de ce mode. Dans un effort pour faire progresser l’étude de cette question, j’examine trois hypothèses bien acceptées qui traitent de l’identité de ce mode : l’interprétation de la force, l’interprétation nomique et l’interprétation cinétique. J’affirme premièrement que l’interprétation de la force et l’interprétation nomique doivent faire face à de sérieuses objections. Deuxièmement, je soutiens que malgré les affirmations contraires des spécialistes, l’interprétation cinétique du MIIE est une option valable.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 315 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, 1984 The Complete Works of Aristotle vol. 1, ed. Barnes, J., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan 1984 A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan 2003 Learning from Six Philosophers vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert 1991 The Works of Robert Boyle eds. Hunter, M. and Davis, E.B., London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
Cover, J.A.1999“Spinoza’s Extended Substance: Cartesian and Leibnizian Reflections,” in New Essays on the Rationalists, eds. Gennaro, R. and Huenemann, C., Oxford University Press: 105–133.Google Scholar
Curley, E.M.1969 Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M.1988 Behind the Geometrical Method Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dea, Shannon 2011“The Infinite and the Indeterminate in Spinoza,” Dialogue, 50 (2011): 603–621.Google Scholar
Descartes, René; 1991 The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. vol. 1, 2: Cottingham, Stoothoff, and Murdoch, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donagan, Alan 1988 Spinoza, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Franks, Richard 2003 Modern Philosophy, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan 1998“New Doctrines of Motion” in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy vol. 1 eds. Garber, D. and Ayers, M., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 649–679.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel 1992 Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don 1991“Spinoza’s Necessitarianism,” in God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Y., Leiden: Brill: 191–218.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don 1994“Spinoza’s Theory of Metaphysical Individuation,” in Individuation in Early Modern Philosophy, eds. Barber, K.F. and Gracia, J.J.E., Albany, NY: State University of New York Press: 73–101.Google Scholar
Giancotti, Emilia 1991“On the Problem of Infinite Modes,” in God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Y., Leiden: Brill: 97–118.Google Scholar
Grant, Edward 1981 Much Ado About Nothing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial 1968 Spinoza I—Dieu, Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Hallett, H.F.1930 Aeternitas: A Spinozistic Study, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart 1951 Spinoza, Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas 1989 Metaphysical Writings ed. Calkins, M.W., La Salle, Il: Open Court.Google Scholar
Huenemann, C.1997“Predicative Interpretations of Spinoza’s Divine Extension,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 14: 53–75.Google Scholar
Huenemann, C.2004“Spinoza and Prime Matter,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 42: 21–32.Google Scholar
Joachim, H.H.1964 A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza, New York: Russell and Russell, Inc.Google Scholar
Lachterman, David 1980“The Physics of Spinoza’s Ethics” in Spinoza: New Perspectives eds. Shahan, R. W. and Biro, J. I., Norman: University of Oklahoma Press: 71–111.Google Scholar
Manning, Richard 2012“Spinoza’s Physical Theory” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/spinoza-physics/>.Google Scholar
Martin, C.2008“The Framework of Essences in Spinoza’s Ethics,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (3):489 – 509.Google Scholar
Martin, C.2010“A New Challenge to the Necessitarian Reading of Spinoza” in Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy V ed. Garber, D. and Nadler, S., Oxford: Oxford University Press: 25–70.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak 2009“Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Substance: The Substance-Mode Relation as a Relation of Inherence and Predication” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78: 17–82.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven 2006 Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Issac 2004 Philosophical Writings, ed. Janiak, A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Thaddeus S.2009“Spinoza on the Vacuum and the Simplicity of Corporeal Substance,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 26: 63–82.Google Scholar
Schliesser, Eric Forthcoming “Spinoza and the Philosophy of Science: Mathematics, Motion, and Being.”Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad 1999“Spinoza on the Vacuum,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 81: 174–205.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch 1925 Spinoza Opera, edited by Gebhardt, C., Heidelberg: Carl Winters.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch 1985 The Collected Works of Spinoza, ed. and trans. by Curley, E., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch 2002 Complete Works, trans. Shirley, by S., ed. Morgan, M.L., Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Viljanen, Valtteri 2007“Field-Metaphysic, Power, and Individuation in Spinoza,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 37: 393–418.Google Scholar
Woolhouse, R.S.1990“Spinoza and Descartes and the Existence of Extended Substance” in Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy eds. Cover, J.A. and Kulstad, M., Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing: 23–48.Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu 1991“The Infinite Mode and Natural Laws in Spinoza” in God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics ed. Yovel, Y., Leiden: Brill: 79–96.Google Scholar