No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Hypocrisy and Integrity: Machiavelli, Rousseau, and the Ethics of PoliticsRuth W. Grant Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1997, xii + 201 pp., $22.50 paper
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2010
Abstract
- Type
- Book Reviews/Comptes rendus
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , Summer 1999 , pp. 671 - 674
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1999
References
Notes
1 Examples of literature not noted by Grant include Benn, Piers, “What Is Wrong with Hypocrisy?” International Journal of Moral and Social Studies, 8 (1993): 223–35Google Scholar; Crisp, Roger and Cowton, Christopher, “Hypocrisy and Moral Seriousness,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 31 (1994): 343–49Google Scholar; Kittay, Eva Feder, “On Hypocrisy,” Metaphilosophy, 13 (1982): 277–289Google Scholar; McKinnon, Christine, “Hypocrisy, With a Note on Integrity,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 28 (1991): 321–29Google Scholar; Szabados, Béla, “Hypocrisy,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 9 (1979): 195–210Google Scholar; Turner, Dan, “Hypocrisy,” Metaphilosophy, 21 (1990): 262–69Google Scholar; Szabados, Béla and Soifer, Eldon, “Hypocrisy after Aristotle,” Dialogue, 37 (1998): 545–70Google Scholar; and Eldon Soifer and Béla Szabados, “Hypocrisy and Consequentialism,” Utilitas, forthcoming.
2 Influential examples of the missing literature on integrity include Taylor, Gabriele, “Integrity,” in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (London, 1981), supplementary vol. 55, pp. 143–59Google Scholar; and Williams, Bernard, “A Critique of Utilitarianism,” in Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, Bernard, eds., Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973)Google Scholar.
3 Newman, Jay, Fanatics and Hypocrites (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1986)Google Scholar.