Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:52:03.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heidegger and Galileo’s Slippery Slope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Shannon Dea
Shannon Dea*
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In Die Frage nach dem Ding, Martin Heidegger characterizes Galileo as an important transitional figure in the struggle to replace the Aristotelian conception of nature with that of Newton. However, Heidegger only attends to Galileo’s modernity and not to those Aristotelian elements still discernible in Galileo’s work. This article fleshes out both aspects in Galileo in light of Heidegger’s discussion. It concludes by arguing that the lacuna in Heidegger’s account of Galileo is the consequence of Heidegger’s own self-conscious modernity − a modernity that he slyly hints at in a remark he makes in FD concerning Galileo and Democritus.

RÉSUMÉ : Dans Die Frage nach dem Ding, Martin Heidegger qualifie Galilée de figure importante dans la lutte pour remplacer la conception aristotélicienne de la nature par celle de Newton. Toutefois, Heidegger examine seulement les traits modernes de Galilée et non ceux qui ressemblent à Aristote. Cet article précise ces deux aspects à partir de la discussion dans Die Frage nach dem Ding. Il conclut par l’affirmation que la lacune dans le portrait de Galilée est la conséquence de la modernité consciente de Heidegger lui-même — une modernité à laquelle il fait allusion dans une remarque concernant Galilée et Démocrite.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 59 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

AWP 1977 “The Age of the World Picture.” Martin Heidegger. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Edited and Translated by Lovitt, William. New York: Garland, pp. 115-154.Google Scholar
CTSH 2002 “The Concept of Time in the Science of History.” Translated by Taylor, Harry S., Uffelman, Hans W., and van Buren, John. Martin Heidegger. Supplements: From the Earliest Essays to Being and Time and Beyond. Edited by van Buren, John. Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 49-60.Google Scholar
FD 1962 Die Frage nach dem Ding: Zu Kants Lehre von den transzendentalen Grundsätzen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
MSMM 1977 “Modern Science, Metaphysics, and Mathematics.” Translated by Barton, W. B. Jr. and Deutsch, Vera. Martin Heidegger. Basic Writings. Edited by Farrell Krell, David. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 243-282.Google Scholar
ZG 1972 “Der Zeitbegriff in der Geschichtswissenschaft.” Martin Heidegger. Frühe Schriften. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, pp. 355-375.Google Scholar
ZW 1957 “Die Zeit des Weltbildes.” Martin Heidegger. Holzwege. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, pp. 69-104.Google Scholar
Cahoone, Lawrence E. 1986 “The Interpretation of Galilean Science: Cassirer Contrasted with Husserl and Heidegger.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 17/1: 1-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, Stillman 1989 History of Free Fall: Aristotle to Galileo. Toronto: Wall and Thompson.Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman 1999 “Galileo and the Law of Inertia.” Stillman Drake, Essays on Galileo and the History and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 2. Edited by Swerdlow, N. M. and Levere, T. H.. Toronto: U. of T. Press, pp. 121-133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galilei, Galileo 1960 De Motu. Translated by Drabkin, I. E.. Galilei, Galileo. On Motion and On Mechanics. Madison: U. of Wisconsin P., pp. 3-131.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo 1914 Dialogue Concerning Two New Sciences. Translated by Crew, Henry and de Salvio, Alfonso. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
The Galileo Project 2008 “On Motion,” http://galileo.rice.edu/sci/theories/on_motion.html. Accessed 18 October.Google Scholar
Glazebrook, Trish 1998 “Heidegger on the Experiment.” Philosophy Today, 42/3: 250-261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazebrook, Trish 2000 Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science. New York: Fordham.Google Scholar
Hooper, Wallace 1998 “Inertial problems in Galileo’s preinertial framework.” The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Edited by Machamer, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., pp. 146-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1956 Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Kemp Smith, Norman. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 2002 “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice.” First Philosophy: Fundamental Problems and Readings in Philosophy. Edited by Bailey, Andrew. Peterborough: Broadview Press, pp. 369-387.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter 1998 “Galileo’s machines, his mathematics, and his experiments.” The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Edited by Machamer, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., pp. 53-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac 1999 The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by Bernard Cohen, I. and Whitman, Anne. Berkeley: U. of California P.Google Scholar
Reitan, Eric A. 1996 “Nature, Place, and Space: Albert the Great and the Origins of Modern Science.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 70/1: 83-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, William A. 1998 “Galileo’s Pisan studies in science and philosophy.” The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Edited by Machamer, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., pp. 27-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AWP 1977 “The Age of the World Picture.” Martin Heidegger. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Edited and Translated by Lovitt, William. New York: Garland, pp. 115-154.Google Scholar
CTSH 2002 “The Concept of Time in the Science of History.” Translated by Taylor, Harry S., Uffelman, Hans W., and van Buren, John. Martin Heidegger. Supplements: From the Earliest Essays to Being and Time and Beyond. Edited by van Buren, John. Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 49-60.Google Scholar
FD 1962 Die Frage nach dem Ding: Zu Kants Lehre von den transzendentalen Grundsätzen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
MSMM 1977 “Modern Science, Metaphysics, and Mathematics.” Translated by Barton, W. B. Jr. and Deutsch, Vera. Martin Heidegger. Basic Writings. Edited by Farrell Krell, David. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 243-282.Google Scholar
ZG 1972 “Der Zeitbegriff in der Geschichtswissenschaft.” Martin Heidegger. Frühe Schriften. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, pp. 355-375.Google Scholar
ZW 1957 “Die Zeit des Weltbildes.” Martin Heidegger. Holzwege. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, pp. 69-104.Google Scholar
Cahoone, Lawrence E. 1986 “The Interpretation of Galilean Science: Cassirer Contrasted with Husserl and Heidegger.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 17/1: 1-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, Stillman 1989 History of Free Fall: Aristotle to Galileo. Toronto: Wall and Thompson.Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman 1999 “Galileo and the Law of Inertia.” Stillman Drake, Essays on Galileo and the History and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 2. Edited by Swerdlow, N. M. and Levere, T. H.. Toronto: U. of T. Press, pp. 121-133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galilei, Galileo 1960 De Motu. Translated by Drabkin, I. E.. Galilei, Galileo. On Motion and On Mechanics. Madison: U. of Wisconsin P., pp. 3-131.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo 1914 Dialogue Concerning Two New Sciences. Translated by Crew, Henry and de Salvio, Alfonso. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
The Galileo Project 2008 “On Motion,” http://galileo.rice.edu/sci/theories/on_motion.html. Accessed 18 October.Google Scholar
Glazebrook, Trish 1998 “Heidegger on the Experiment.” Philosophy Today, 42/3: 250-261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazebrook, Trish 2000 Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science. New York: Fordham.Google Scholar
Hooper, Wallace 1998 “Inertial problems in Galileo’s preinertial framework.” The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Edited by Machamer, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., pp. 146-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1956 Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Kemp Smith, Norman. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 2002 “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice.” First Philosophy: Fundamental Problems and Readings in Philosophy. Edited by Bailey, Andrew. Peterborough: Broadview Press, pp. 369-387.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter 1998 “Galileo’s machines, his mathematics, and his experiments.” The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Edited by Machamer, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., pp. 53-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac 1999 The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Translated by Bernard Cohen, I. and Whitman, Anne. Berkeley: U. of California P.Google Scholar
Reitan, Eric A. 1996 “Nature, Place, and Space: Albert the Great and the Origins of Modern Science.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 70/1: 83-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, William A. 1998 “Galileo’s Pisan studies in science and philosophy.” The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Edited by Machamer, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., pp. 27-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar