Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:38:19.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Formalist Treatment of Spinoza*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Vance Maxwell
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Extract

Professor Bennett's new book on Spinoza is a notably ambitious one. It i s ambitious in two ways. First, having worked on the book for twenty-five years, Bennett intends a treatment of Spinoza's Ethics at once comprehensive in scope and detailed in analysis. He tells us that his book “expounds and argues with Spinoza's Ethics, in the hope of drawing into the argument philosophers who have not previously brought Spinoza into their work as an energetic collaborator or antagonist” (1). Second, Bennett claims to have written a book superior to other commentaries in that “The courtly deference which pretends that Spinoza is always or usually right, under some rescuing interpretation is one thing; it is quite another to look to him, as I have throughout this book, as a teacher, one who can help us to see things which we might not have seen for ourselves. This is showing him a deeper respect, but also holding him to a more demanding standard” (372).

Type
Critical Notices/Etudes critiques
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

referances

Boyle, A., 1963 Spinoza's Ethics and On the Correction of the Understanding. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Charlton, W., 1981Spinoza's Monism”, The Philosophical Review 90/4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M., 1969 Spinoza's Metaphysics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elwes, R. H. M., 1955 Benedict De Spinoza. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Feldman, S., 1982 Introduction to The Ethics and Selected Letters. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hubbeling, H., 1964 Spinoza's Methodology. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Lewis, D., 1978 “On the Aims and Method of Spinoza's Philosophy”, in Spinoza: New Perspectives. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Rice, L., 1974 “Methodology and Modality in the First Part of Spinoza's Ethics”, in Spinoza on Knowing, Being and Freedom. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Shmueli, E., 1978 “The Geometrical Method, Personal Caution and the Idea of Tolerance”, in Spinoza: New Perspectives. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar