Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:01:10.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Context-Sensitivity Beyond Indexicality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Richard Vallée
Richard Vallée
Affiliation:
Université de Moncton, Campus de Shippagan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , Winter 2003 , pp. 79 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach, K. 1994 “Conversational Impliciture.” Mind and Language, 9, 2: 124–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. 1999 “The Semantics Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters.” In The Semantics-Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Edited by Turner, K.. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 65–84.Google Scholar
Condoravdi, C., and Gawron, J. M. 1995 “The Context Dependency of Implicit Arguments.” In Quantifiers, Deduction and Context. Edited by Kanazawa, M., Pinon, C., and de Swart, H.. Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1977 “On Sense and Reference.” In Philosophical Writings. Translated by Geach, P. and Black, M.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1989 Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. 1989 “Demonstratives.” In Themes from Kaplan. Edited by Almog, J., Perry, J., and Wettstein, H.. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 481–563.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G. 1992 “Two Kinds of Indexicality.” In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Edited by Barker, C. and Dowty, D.. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, pp. 283–301.Google Scholar
Partee, B. 1989 “Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts.” Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society, 25: 342–65.Google Scholar
Perry, J. 1977 “The Problem of the Essential Indexical.” Nous, 13: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. 1986 “Thoughts Without Representation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 60: 137–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. 1988 “Cognitive Significance and New Theories of Reference.” Nous, 22: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. 1997 “Indexicals and Demonstratives.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Edited by Wright, C. and Gale, R.. London: Basil Blackwell, pp. 586–612.Google Scholar
Récanati, F. 1994 “Contextualism and Anti-Contextualism in the Philosophy of Language.” In Foundations of Speech Act Theory. Edited by Tsohatzidis, S. L.. New York: Routledge, pp. 156–66.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R., and Vanderveken, D. 1985 Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. 2000 “Context and Logical Form.” Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 4: 391–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettstein, H. 1986 “Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake ?” Journal of Philosophy, 83: 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar