Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:18:42.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Case against Punishment: Retribution, Crime Prevention, and the LawDeirdre Golash New York: New York University Press, 2005, ix + 219 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Mane Hajdin
Mane Hajdin
Affiliation:
Santa Clara University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , Spring 2007 , pp. 402 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 For an earlier example of such a suggestion, see Burgh, Richard W., “Do the Guilty Deserve Punishment?” The Journal of Philosophy, 79 (1982): 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Barnett, Randy E., “Restitution: A New Paradigm of Criminal Justice,” Ethics, 87 (1977): 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar