Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T01:51:05.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Functional independence among young adults with spina bifida, in relation to hydrocephalus and level of lesion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2006

Marjolein Verhoef
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, the Netherlands.
Hans A Barf
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, the Netherlands.
Marcel WM Post
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Floris WA van Asbeck
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, the Netherlands.
Rob HJM Gooskens
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Rudolph Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Arie JH Prevo
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Get access

Abstract

Knowledge about the level of functional independence that can be expected in adulthood might support decisions on the treatment of newborn infants with spina bifida. This study determined functional independence among young adults with spina bifida and its relationships with pathological characteristics known from birth (hydrocephalus and level of lesion). Data were collected from medical records and by physical examination. Functional independence was assessed on six domains (self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition) using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Participants were 165 patients with spina bifida (69 males, 96 females; age range 16 to 25y, mean 20y 9mo [SD 2.9]; 117 with hydrocephalus). Patients without hydrocephalus were independent for all FIM domains except sphincter control, as were patients with hydrocephalus with a lesion level below L2. Most patients with hydrocephalus and a lesion at L2 or above were dependent as regards sphincter control (98%), locomotion (79%), and self-care (54%), and quite a few needed support in transfers (38%), social cognition (29%), and communication (15%).

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
2006 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)